Screening for colorectal neoplasms with new fecal occult blood tests: update on performance characteristics
- PMID: 17895475
- DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djm150
Screening for colorectal neoplasms with new fecal occult blood tests: update on performance characteristics
Abstract
Background: One type of fecal occult blood test (FOBT), the unrehydrated guaiac fecal occult blood test (GT), is recommended by the United States Preventive Services Task Force and the Institute of Medicine for use in screening programs, but it has relatively low sensitivity as a single test for detecting advanced colonic neoplasms (cancer and adenomatous polyps > or = 1 cm in diameter). Thus, improving the sensitivity of FOBT should make colon cancer screening programs that use these tests more effective.
Methods: We assessed prospectively the performance characteristics of two newer FOBTs in 5841 subjects at average risk for colorectal cancer in a large group-model managed care organization. The tests evaluated included a sensitive GT, a fecal immunochemical test (FIT), and the combination of both tests. Patients with positive and negative test results were advised to have colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity for detecting advanced neoplasms in the left colon within 2 years after the FOBT screening were evaluated for the two tests administered separately and in combination.
Results: A total of 139 patients were diagnosed with advanced colorectal neoplasms (n = 14 cancers, n = 128 adenomas) within the 2 years following their initial FOBT screening. Sensitivity for detecting cancer was 81.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 47.8% to 96.8%) for the FIT alone and 64.3% (95% CI = 35.6% to 86.0%) for the sensitive GT and the combination test. Sensitivity for detecting advanced colorectal adenomas was 41.3% (95% CI = 32.7% to 50.4%) for the sensitive GT, 29.5% (95% CI = 21.4% to 38.9%) for the FIT, and 22.8% (95% CI =16.1% to 31.3%) for the combination test. Specificity for detecting cancer and adenomas was 98.1% (95% CI = 97.7% to 98.4%) and 98.4% (95% CI = 98.0% to 98.7%), respectively, for the combination test; 96.9% (95% CI = 96.4% to 97.4%) and 97.3% (95% CI = 96.8% to 97.7%), respectively, for the FIT; and 90.1% (95% CI = 89.3% to 90.8%) and 90.6% (95% CI = 89.8% to 91.4%), respectively, for the sensitive GT.
Conclusions: The FIT has high sensitivity and specificity for detecting left-sided colorectal cancer, and it may be a useful replacement for the GT.
Comment in
-
Which colorectal cancer screening test is best?J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007 Oct 3;99(19):1424-5. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djm166. Epub 2007 Sep 25. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007. PMID: 17895471 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of a brush-sampling fecal immunochemical test for hemoglobin with a sensitive guaiac-based fecal occult blood test in detection of colorectal neoplasia.Cancer. 2006 Nov 1;107(9):2152-9. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22230. Cancer. 2006. PMID: 16998938
-
Random comparison of guaiac and immunochemical fecal occult blood tests for colorectal cancer in a screening population.Gastroenterology. 2008 Jul;135(1):82-90. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.03.040. Epub 2008 Mar 25. Gastroenterology. 2008. PMID: 18482589 Clinical Trial.
-
Screening for familial colorectal cancer with a sensitive immunochemical fecal occult blood test: a pilot study.Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009 Sep;21(9):1062-7. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e3283293797. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009. PMID: 19307978
-
[Chemical or immunological tests for the detection of fecal occult blood in colorectal cancer screening?].Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009 Oct;32(8):565-76. doi: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2009.01.179. Epub 2009 Jul 3. Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009. PMID: 19577340 Review. Spanish.
-
New stool screening tests for colorectal cancer.Digestion. 2007;76(1):26-33. doi: 10.1159/000108391. Epub 2007 Oct 19. Digestion. 2007. PMID: 17947816 Review.
Cited by
-
Using resource modelling to inform decision making and service planning: the case of colorectal cancer screening in Ireland.BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Mar 19;13:105. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-105. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013. PMID: 23510135 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of verification bias on the sensitivity of fecal occult blood testing: a meta-analysis.J Gen Intern Med. 2010 Nov;25(11):1211-21. doi: 10.1007/s11606-010-1375-0. Epub 2010 May 25. J Gen Intern Med. 2010. PMID: 20499198 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Stool DNA and occult blood testing for screen detection of colorectal neoplasia.Ann Intern Med. 2008 Oct 7;149(7):441-50, W81. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-149-7-200810070-00004. Ann Intern Med. 2008. PMID: 18838724 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Colorectal cancer, screening and primary care: A mini literature review.World J Gastroenterol. 2017 Sep 7;23(33):6049-6058. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i33.6049. World J Gastroenterol. 2017. PMID: 28970720 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Virtual colonoscopy vs optical colonoscopy.Expert Opin Med Diagn. 2010 Mar 1;4(2):159-169. doi: 10.1517/17530051003658736. Expert Opin Med Diagn. 2010. PMID: 20473367 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous