[Extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy Da Vinci]
- PMID: 17896553
- DOI: 10.1016/s0210-4806(07)73693-8
[Extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy Da Vinci]
Abstract
Objective: To report the outcomes of 100 robotically assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomies (RALPs), a minimally invasive alternative for treating prostate cancer.
Patients and methods: In all patients was used RALP with an extraperitoneal approach assisted by the da Vinci robotic surgical system (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). Prospective data collection included quality-of-life questionnaires, basic demographics (height, weight and body mass index), prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels, clinical stage and Gleason grade. Variables assessed during RALP were operative duration, estimated blood loss (EBL) and complications, and after RALP were hospital stay, catheter time, pathology, PSA level, return of continence and potency.
Results: The mean (range) duration of RALP was 180 (140-295) min; all procedures were successful, with no intraoperative transfusions or deaths. The mean EBL was 300 mL (40-1100); 97% of patients were discharged home on the first day after RALP with a mean haematocrit of 36%. The mean duration of catheterization was 7 (5-21) days. The positive margin rate was 14% for all patients. The overall biochemical recurrence free (PSA level < 0.1 ng/mL) survival was 95% at mean follow-up of 9.7 months. There was complete continence at 6 months in 95% of patients. At 1 year 78% of patients were potent (with or without the use of oral medications), 15% were not yet able to sustain erections capable of intercourse, and another 7% still required injection therapy.
Conclusion: RALP is a safe, feasible and minimally invasive alternative for treating prostate cancer. Our initial experience with the procedure shows promising short-term outcomes.
Similar articles
-
Robotic radical prostatectomy: outcomes of 500 cases.BJU Int. 2007 May;99(5):1109-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.06762.x. BJU Int. 2007. PMID: 17437441
-
Operative details and oncological and functional outcome of robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: 400 cases with a minimum of 12 months follow-up.Eur Urol. 2009 Jun;55(6):1358-66. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.12.035. Epub 2009 Jan 9. Eur Urol. 2009. PMID: 19147274
-
Comparisons of the perioperative, functional, and oncologic outcomes after robot-assisted versus pure extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.Eur Urol. 2014 Mar;65(3):610-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.11.049. Epub 2012 Dec 1. Eur Urol. 2014. PMID: 23245815
-
Histopathologic outcomes of robotic radical prostatectomy.ScientificWorldJournal. 2006 Jun 2;6:2566-72. doi: 10.1100/tsw.2006.397. ScientificWorldJournal. 2006. PMID: 17619732 Free PMC article. Review.
-
[Robotic radical prostatectomy: overview of our learning curve].Actas Urol Esp. 2007 Jun;31(6):587-92. doi: 10.1016/s0210-4806(07)73694-x. Actas Urol Esp. 2007. PMID: 17896554 Review. Spanish.
Cited by
-
Complications of robotic assisted radical prostatectomy.World J Urol. 2008 Dec;26(6):595-602. doi: 10.1007/s00345-008-0287-7. Epub 2008 Jun 27. World J Urol. 2008. PMID: 18584180
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous