Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2007 Sep 26:8:78.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2202-8-78.

The contribution of high frequencies to human brain activity underlying horizontal localization of natural spatial sounds

Affiliations
Comparative Study

The contribution of high frequencies to human brain activity underlying horizontal localization of natural spatial sounds

Sakari Leino et al. BMC Neurosci. .

Abstract

Background: In the field of auditory neuroscience, much research has focused on the neural processes underlying human sound localization. A recent magnetoencephalography (MEG) study investigated localization-related brain activity by measuring the N1m event-related response originating in the auditory cortex. It was found that the dynamic range of the right-hemispheric N1m response, defined as the mean difference in response magnitude between contralateral and ipsilateral stimulation, reflects cortical activity related to the discrimination of horizontal sound direction. Interestingly, the results also suggested that the presence of realistic spectral information within horizontally located spatial sounds resulted in a larger right-hemispheric N1m dynamic range. Spectral cues being predominant at high frequencies, the present study further investigated the issue by removing frequencies from the spatial stimuli with low-pass filtering. This resulted in a stepwise elimination of direction-specific spectral information. Interaural time and level differences were kept constant. The original, unfiltered stimuli were broadband noise signals presented from five frontal horizontal directions and binaurally recorded for eight human subjects with miniature microphones placed in each subject's ear canals. Stimuli were presented to the subjects during MEG registration and in a behavioral listening experiment.

Results: The dynamic range of the right-hemispheric N1m amplitude was not significantly affected even when all frequencies above 600 Hz were removed. The dynamic range of the left-hemispheric N1m response was significantly diminished by the removal of frequencies over 7.5 kHz. The subjects' behavioral sound direction discrimination was only affected by the removal of frequencies over 600 Hz.

Conclusion: In accord with previous psychophysical findings, the current results indicate that frontal horizontal sound localization and related right-hemispheric cortical processes are insensitive to the presence of high-frequency spectral information. The previously described changes in localization-related brain activity, reflected in the enlarged N1m dynamic range elicited by natural spatial stimuli, can most likely be attributed to the processing of individualized spatial cues present already at relatively low frequencies. The left-hemispheric effect could be an indication of left-hemispheric processing of high-frequency sound information unrelated to sound localization. Taken together, these results provide converging evidence for a hemispheric asymmetry in sound localization.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Representative N1m responses. Equivalent current dipoles (ECDs) calculated for the grand-averaged N1m response at the average peak latency t. The figure shows ECDs for stimuli with different bandwidths originating from directions -90° and 90°, calculated separately for the left and right hemisphere (contour step 20 fT/cm).
Figure 2
Figure 2
N1m dynamic range. The grand-average dynamic range of the N1m amplitude for stimuli with different bandwidths. For the analysis of the dynamic range within each hemisphere, the N1m amplitudes for ipsilateral stimuli were subtracted from their contralateral counterparts. The left-hemispheric dynamic range was diminished by the reduction in bandwidth, while its right-hemispheric counterpart was not significantly affected. Error bars indicate SEM.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Direction discrimination accuracy. The subjects' grand-average accuracy in discrimination of the sound source direction. Stimuli with four different bandwidths were presented from five frontal horizontal directions. Stimuli with the narrowest bandwidth were poorly localized, particularly if originating from the oblique direction angels (-45°, 45°). Error bars indicate SEM.

Similar articles

References

    1. Blauert J. Spatial Hearing Revised edition. Cambridge: The MIT Press; 1997.
    1. Moore BCJ. An Introduction to the Psychology of Hearing. Fifth. Amsterdam: Elsevier Academic Press; 2004.
    1. Cohen YE, Knudsen EI. Maps versus clusters: different representations of auditory space in the midbrain and forebrain. Trends Neurosci. 1999;22:128–135. doi: 10.1016/S0166-2236(98)01295-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kuwada S, Yin TCT. Physiological studies of directional hearing. In: Yost WA, Gourevitch G, editor. Directional Hearing. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1987. pp. 146–176.
    1. Deouell LY, Soroker N. What is extinguished in auditory extinction? NeuroReport. 2000;11:3059–3062. doi: 10.1097/00001756-200009110-00046. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources