Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Oct;16(5):351-6.
doi: 10.1136/tc.2007.020362.

Smoking too few cigarettes to be at risk? Smokers' perceptions of risk and risk denial, a French survey

Affiliations

Smoking too few cigarettes to be at risk? Smokers' perceptions of risk and risk denial, a French survey

Patrick Peretti-Watel et al. Tob Control. 2007 Oct.

Abstract

Background: Past studies on smokers' risk perception have produced mixed results. We endorsed a new approach to assess smokers' perceptions of risk by asking them to estimate threshold values for the cancer risk associated with daily consumption of tobacco and number of smoking years. We expected that many smokers would endorse a "risk denial" attitude, with threshold estimates higher than their own smoking consumption and duration.

Methodology: A French national telephone survey (n = 3820; 979 current smokers) included several questions about smoking behaviours and related beliefs.

Results: Among current smokers, 44% considered that smoking can cause cancer only for a daily consumption higher than their own consumption, and an additional 20% considered that the cancer risk becomes high only for a smoking duration higher than their own. Most smokers also agreed with other "risk denial" statements ("smoking is not more dangerous than air pollution," "some people smoke their whole life but never get sick"). Those who considered they smoked too few cigarettes to be at risk were less likely to report personal fear of smoking related cancer.

Conclusion: Risk denial is quite widespread among smokers and does not simply reflect a lack of information about health risks related to tobacco. Fully informing smokers about their risks may necessitate changing the way they process information to produce beliefs and limiting their capacity to generate self exempting beliefs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: none.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sutton S R. How accurate are smokers' perceptions of risk? Health Risk Soc 19991223–230.
    1. Weinstein N D, Marcus S E, Moser R P. Smokers' unrealistic optimism about their risk. Tob Control 20051455–59. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Slovic P. ed. Smokers: rational actors or rational fools? In: Smoking: risk, perception, & policy. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage 200197–124.
    1. Rise J, Strype J, Sutton S. Comparative risk ratings and lung cancer among Norwegian smokers. Addiction Res Theory 200210313–320.
    1. Sutton S R. Influencing optimism in smokers by giving information about the average smoker. Risk Decision Policy 20027165–174.

Publication types