Availability of litigation as a public health tool for firearm injury prevention: comparison of guns, vaccines, and motor vehicles
- PMID: 17901450
- PMCID: PMC2040374
- DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2006.092544
Availability of litigation as a public health tool for firearm injury prevention: comparison of guns, vaccines, and motor vehicles
Abstract
The Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA), enacted in 2005, grants the firearm industry broad immunity from liability. The PLCAA not only prevents most people from receiving compensation for their firearm-related injuries, it erodes litigation's ability to serve its public health role of providing manufacturers with a financial incentive to make their products safer. When the viability of the vaccine industry was threatened in the 1980s, Congress provided limited protection from liability and also established the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. The liability of nearly all other products, for example motor vehicles, is governed by traditional common law principles. The absence of both litigation and product safety rules for firearms is a potentially dangerous combination for the public's health.
References
-
- Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act, Pub L No. 109-92, 119 Stat 2095, codified at 15 USC §§7901 et seq. (2006).
-
- Dobbs DB, Keeton RE, Owen DG. Prosser and Keeton on Torts. St Paul, Minn: West Publishing Co; 1984.
-
- Epstein RA. Modern Products Liability Law. Westport, Conn: Quorum Books; 1980.
-
- Jacobson PD, Warner KE. Litigation and public health policy making: the case of tobacco control. J Health Polit Policy Law. 1999;24:769–804. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical