Lexical competition is enhanced in the left hemisphere: evidence from different types of orthographic neighbors
- PMID: 17905425
- DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2007.08.005
Lexical competition is enhanced in the left hemisphere: evidence from different types of orthographic neighbors
Abstract
Two divided visual field lexical decision experiments were conducted to examine the role of the cerebral hemispheres in orthographic neighborhood effects. In Experiment 1, we employed two types of words: words with many substitution neighbors (high-N) and words with few substitution neighbors (low-N). Results showed a facilitative effect of N in the left visual field (i.e., right hemisphere) and an inhibitory effect of N in the right visual field (left hemisphere). In Experiment 2, we examined whether the inhibitory effect of the higher frequency neighbors increases in the left hemisphere as compared to the right hemisphere. To go beyond the usual N-metrics, we selected words with (or without) higher frequency neighbors (addition, deletion, or transposition neighbors). Results showed that the inhibitory effect of neighborhood frequency is enhanced in the right visual field. We examine the implications of these findings for the orthographic coding schemes employed by the models of visual word recognition.
Similar articles
-
Orthographic neighborhood effects in the right but not in the left cerebral hemisphere.Brain Lang. 2002 Jan;80(1):63-76. doi: 10.1006/brln.2001.2570. Brain Lang. 2002. PMID: 11817890
-
Evaluating a split processing model of visual word recognition: effects of orthographic neighborhood size.Brain Lang. 2004 Mar;88(3):312-20. doi: 10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00164-0. Brain Lang. 2004. PMID: 14967214 Clinical Trial.
-
Word length and orthographic neighborhood size effects in the left and right cerebral hemispheres.Brain Lang. 2002 Jan;80(1):45-62. doi: 10.1006/brln.2001.2583. Brain Lang. 2002. PMID: 11817889
-
Length, formats, neighbours, hemispheres, and the processing of words presented laterally or at fixation.Brain Lang. 2004 Mar;88(3):355-66. doi: 10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00166-4. Brain Lang. 2004. PMID: 14967218 Review.
-
Hemisphere-specific effects in word recognition do not require hemisphere-specific modes of access.Brain Lang. 2004 Mar;88(3):279-93. doi: 10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00160-3. Brain Lang. 2004. PMID: 14967212 Review.
Cited by
-
Processing difficulty while reading words with neighbors is not due to increased foveal load: Evidence from eye movements.Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024 May;86(4):1360-1374. doi: 10.3758/s13414-024-02880-z. Epub 2024 Mar 26. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024. PMID: 38532237
-
An inhibitory influence of transposed-letter neighbors on eye movements during reading.Psychon Bull Rev. 2016 Feb;23(1):278-84. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0869-5. Psychon Bull Rev. 2016. PMID: 26032225
-
A normative study of acronyms and acronym naming.Behav Res Methods. 2012 Sep;44(3):862-89. doi: 10.3758/s13428-011-0175-8. Behav Res Methods. 2012. PMID: 22180103 Free PMC article.
-
Linguistic and attentional factors - Not statistical regularities - Contribute to word-selective neural responses with FPVS-oddball paradigms.Cortex. 2024 Apr;173:339-354. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2024.01.007. Epub 2024 Feb 13. Cortex. 2024. PMID: 38479348 Free PMC article.
-
Lexical embeddings produce interference when they are morphologically unrelated to the words in which they are contained: Evidence from eye movements.J Cogn Psychol (Hove). 2012;24(2):179-188. doi: 10.1080/20445911.2011.604028. Epub 2011 Oct 20. J Cogn Psychol (Hove). 2012. PMID: 22900139 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources