Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2008 Oct;33(9):1046-61; discussion 1062-4.
doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsm083. Epub 2007 Sep 28.

Evidence-based assessment in pediatric psychology: family measures

Melissa A Alderfer  1 , Barbara H Fiese, Jeffrey I Gold, J J Cutuli, Grayson N Holmbeck, Lutz Goldbeck, Christine T Chambers, Mona Abad, Dante Spetter, Joän Patterson
Affiliations
Review

Evidence-based assessment in pediatric psychology: family measures

Melissa A Alderfer et al. J Pediatr Psychol. 2008 Oct.

Abstract

Objective: To provide a review of the evidence base of family measures relevant to pediatric psychology.

Method: Twenty-nine family measures were selected based upon endorsement by Division 54 listserv members, expert judgment, and literature review. Spanning observational and self-report methods, the measures fell into three broad assessment categories: Family functioning, Dyadic family relationships, and Family functioning in the context of childhood chronic health conditions. Measures were categorized as: "Well-established", "Approaching well-established", or "Promising."

Results: Nineteen measures met "well-established" criteria and the remaining ten were "approaching well-established." "Well-established" measures were documented for each of the broad assessment categories named above.

Conclusions: Many measures deemed "well-established" in the general population are proving to be reliable and useful in pediatric samples. More evidence of the validity of family measures is needed in this context. This review should prove helpful to clinicians and researchers as they strive to make evidence-based decisions regarding family measures.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Alderfer MA, Kazak AE. Family issues when a child is on treatment for cancer. In: Brown R, editor. Pediatric hematology/oncology: A biopsychosocial approach. New York: Oxford University Press; 2006. pp. 53–74.
    1. Aniol K, Mullins L, Page MC, Boyd ML, Chaney JM. The relationship between respite care and child abuse potential in parents of children with developmental disabilities: A preliminary report. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities. 2004;16:273–285.
    1. Armsden GC, Greenberg MT. The inventory of parent and peer attachment: Individual differences and their relationship to psychological well being in adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence. 1987;16:427–454. - PubMed
    1. Atkins DC. Using multilevel models to analyze couple and family treatment data: Basic and advanced issues. Journal of Family Psychology. 2005;19:98–110. - PubMed
    1. Barney MC, Max JE. The McMaster family assessment device and clinical rating scale: Questionnaire vs. interview in childhood traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury. 2005;19:801–809. - PubMed

Publication types