Critical difference table for word recognition testing derived using computer simulation
- PMID: 17905906
- DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2007/084)
Critical difference table for word recognition testing derived using computer simulation
Abstract
Purpose: To construct a table for upper and lower limits of the 95% critical range for changes in word recognition scores obtained with monosyllabic word lists (of lengths 10, 25, 50, and 100 words) using newly available methods. Although such a table has been available for nearly 30 years (A. R. Thornton & M. J. M. Raffin, 1978), the earlier table was constructed by calculation and used an approximation to the variance of the difference score between 2 administrations of word lists of identical size. It has been used clinically, reproduced, and recommended for use by clinicians in handbooks and textbooks.
Method: The new table was created using computer simulation of the relevant distributions and a direct estimate of the variance of the difference score between 2 tests, calculated using the simulated results.
Results: The new table differed from the previous table in 23% of entries. Critical ranges were both narrowed (82%) and expanded (18%). No range changed by more than 1 word correct in any direction. The original table was most accurate for list sizes of 25 words each.
Conclusion: Using the new table will provide more accurate estimates of the 95% critical range for successive administrations of word recognition tests.
Similar articles
-
The development of Cantonese Lexical Neighborhood Test: a pilot study.Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2008 Jul;72(7):1121-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2008.03.025. Epub 2008 May 15. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2008. PMID: 18485493
-
Clinical Strategies for Sampling Word Recognition Performance.J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2018 Apr 17;61(4):936-944. doi: 10.1044/2017_JSLHR-H-17-0236. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2018. PMID: 29536073
-
Elekta Precise Table characteristics of IGRT remote table positioning.Acta Oncol. 2009;48(2):267-70. doi: 10.1080/02841860802311007. Acta Oncol. 2009. PMID: 18756401
-
Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.Food Chem Toxicol. 2008 Mar;46 Suppl 1:S2-70. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2008.02.008. Epub 2008 Feb 13. Food Chem Toxicol. 2008. PMID: 18328408 Review.
-
From trial and error to trial simulation. Part 1: the importance of model-based drug development for antidepressant drugs.Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2009 Sep;86(3):248-54. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2009.105. Epub 2009 Aug 5. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2009. PMID: 19657333 Review.
Cited by
-
Preliminary Guidelines for Replacing Word-Recognition in Quiet With Speech in Noise Assessment in the Routine Audiologic Test Battery.Ear Hear. 2023 Nov-Dec 01;44(6):1548-1561. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001409. Epub 2023 Aug 22. Ear Hear. 2023. PMID: 37703127 Free PMC article.
-
The Effects of Preprocessing Strategies for Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients.J Am Acad Audiol. 2016 Feb;27(2):85-102. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.14058. J Am Acad Audiol. 2016. PMID: 26905529 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of lower frequency-to-electrode allocations on speech and pitch perception with the hybrid short-electrode cochlear implant.Audiol Neurootol. 2012;17(6):357-72. doi: 10.1159/000341165. Epub 2012 Aug 14. Audiol Neurootol. 2012. PMID: 22907151 Free PMC article.
-
Transitioning from bimodal to bilateral cochlear implant listening: speech recognition and localization in four individuals.Am J Audiol. 2014 Mar;23(1):79-92. doi: 10.1044/1059-0889(2013/11-0031). Am J Audiol. 2014. PMID: 24018578 Free PMC article.
-
The next generation of Nucleus(®) fitting: a multiplatform approach towards universal cochlear implant management.Int J Audiol. 2013 Jul;52(7):485-94. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2013.781277. Epub 2013 Apr 25. Int J Audiol. 2013. PMID: 23617610 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources