Relevance and limits of the principle of "equivalence of care" in prison medicine
- PMID: 17906061
- PMCID: PMC2652802
- DOI: 10.1136/jme.2006.018077
Relevance and limits of the principle of "equivalence of care" in prison medicine
Abstract
The principle of "equivalence of care" in prison medicine is a principle by which prison health services are obliged to provide prisoners with care of a quality equivalent to that provided for the general public in the same country. It is cited in numerous national and international directives and recommendations. The principle of equivalence is extremely relevant from the point of view of normative ethics but requires adaptation from the point of view of applied ethics. From a clinical point of view, the principle of equivalence is often insufficient to take account of the adaptations necessary for the organization of care in a correctional setting. The principle of equivalence is cost-effective in general, but has to be overstepped to ensure the humane management of certain special cases.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
References
-
- United Nations http://www.un.org (accessed 1 May 2007)
-
- World Health Organisation www.euro.who.int/prisons (accessed 1 May 2007)
-
- Posner M J. The Estelle medical professional judgment standard: the right of those in state custody to receive high‐cost medical treatments. Am J Law Med 199218347–368. - PubMed
-
- US Department of Justice Correctional health care: guidelines for the management of an adequate delivery system. US Department of Justice, National Institute of Corrections 2001
-
- Council of Europe www.cpt.coe.int (accessed 1 May 2007)
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical