Posterior spine fusion with Moss-Miami instrumentation for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: radiographic, clinical and patient-centered outcomes
- PMID: 17907427
- PMCID: PMC2150647
Posterior spine fusion with Moss-Miami instrumentation for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: radiographic, clinical and patient-centered outcomes
Abstract
This paper evaluates the efficacy the Moss-Miami System instrumentation for surgical treatment of spinal deformity. Eight-five patients with AIS underwent a posterior spinal fusion with using this system between 1994 and 1998. Radiographs of the spine were taken preoperatively, at discharge, one year after surgery, and at the latest follow-up (average of 2.5 year, range 2 to 6 years). All radiographs were assessed for curve magnitude, coronal balance, kyphosis, lordosis, junctional kyphosis, and sagittal balance. The Scoliosis Research Society instrument was administered at the final follow-up. The average curve correction ranged from 53 to 65 percent. All patients showed solid fusion by final follow-up. Three patients required a second operation for complications related to their scoliosis; two patients showed a rod fracture without evidence of pseudoarthrosis or curve progression. Two transient neurological complications related to the surgery were observed. SRS results were favorable with regard to function and cosmetic appearance.
Figures








Similar articles
-
The effectiveness of selective thoracic fusion for treating adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a systematic review protocol.JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Nov;13(11):4-16. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2338. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015. PMID: 26657460
-
Comparison of anterior and posterior instrumentation for correction of adolescent thoracic idiopathic scoliosis.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999 Feb 1;24(3):225-39. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199902010-00007. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999. PMID: 10025017 Clinical Trial.
-
A 10-Year Radiographic Study Comparing Anterior Versus Posterior Instrumented Spinal Fusion in Patients With Lenke Type 5 Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020 May 1;45(9):612-620. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003331. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020. PMID: 31770332
-
Cotrel-Dubousset (CD) or Universal Spine System (USS) instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS): comparison of midterm clinical, functional, and radiologic outcomes.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Sep 15;29(18):2024-30. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000138408.64907.dc. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004. PMID: 15371703 Review.
-
Comparative analysis of pedicle screw versus hook instrumentation in posterior spinal fusion of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Sep 15;29(18):2040-8. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000138268.12324.1a. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004. PMID: 15371706 Review.
References
-
- Asher MA, Burton DC. A concept of idiopathic scoliosis deformities as imperfect torsion(s) Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research. 1999;(364):11–25. - PubMed
-
- Asher MA, Min Lai S, Burton DC. Further development and validation of the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) outcomes instrument. Spine. 2000;25(18):2381–2386. - PubMed
-
- Aurori BF, Weierman RJ, Lowell HA, Nadel CI, Parsons JR. Pseudarthrosis after spinal fusion for scoliosis. A comparison of autogeneic and allogeneic bone grafts. Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research. 1985;(199):153–158. - PubMed
-
- Behairy YM, Hauser DL, Hill D. Partial correction of Cobb angle prior to posterior spinal instrumentation. Ann Saudi Med. 2000;20(5–6):398–401. - PubMed
-
- Betz RR, Harms J, Clements DH, 3rd, Lenke LG, Lowe TG, Shufflebarger HL, Jeszenszky D, Beele B. Comparison of anterior and posterior instrumentation for correction of adolescent thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 1999;24(3):225–239. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical