[Favourable long-term results from cemented total hip arthroplasty combined with acetabular bone impaction grafting in patients under the age of 50]
- PMID: 17907545
[Favourable long-term results from cemented total hip arthroplasty combined with acetabular bone impaction grafting in patients under the age of 50]
Abstract
Objective: Determination of long-term results of hip replacements in patients who, at the time of operation, were under the age of 50. Procedures whereby an existing acetabulum defect was filled with bone chips that were impacted into a strong layer, after which a cemented total hip prosthesis was implanted.
Design: Descriptive.
Method: Prospectively collected data from patients who were under the age of 50, and had undergone a hip replacement operation at our hospital between 1 July 1979 and 31 December 1987 were analysed. Data were collected up to 31 December 2002. The main outcome was time to revision. Survival was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method.
Results: The study group consisted of 25 patients, 17 women and 8 men with 29 prosthetic hips. The average age at operation was 37.6 years (range: 20-49). Follow-up time was 15-23 years (median: 18.7 years). 1 patient (1 hip) was lost to follow-up. 3 patients (4 hips) died within 15 years after the operation; none of them had undergone revision. 4 revisions had been performed: I septic loosening (14 years p.o.) and 3 aseptic loosenings (6, 15, 20 years p.o.). The cumulative survival with the end-point 'revision for any reason' was 96% (95% CI: 88-100) at to years and 88% (95% CI: 74-100) at 20 years; after exclusion of the septic loosening the survival at 20 years was 92% (95% CI: 80-100).
Conclusion: Hip replacement including a reconstruction technique for an acetabulum defect in patients under the age of 50 was regarded as successful if after 10 years, at least 90% of the prostheses were still in situ.
Comment in
-
[Prognosis of total hip replacement: the importance of an implant register].Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2007 Sep 1;151(35):1915-7. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2007. PMID: 17907540 Dutch.
Similar articles
-
[Total hip arthroplasty in patients under 40 years of age and, if indicated, reconstruction of acetabular defects with bone impaction grafting].Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2010;154:A811. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2010. PMID: 20482927 Dutch.
-
[Selection of the type in revision total hip replacement for failed hip arthroplasty].Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2004 Mar;18(2):135-7. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2004. PMID: 15065415 Chinese.
-
[Treatment of aseptic acetabular loosening by reconstruction combining bone graft and Müller ring. Actuarial analysis over 11 years].Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1998 Feb;84(1):51-60. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1998. PMID: 9775022 French.
-
[Choice of hip prosthesis in patients younger than 50 years].Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2007 Sep 1;151(35):1918-22. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2007. PMID: 17907541 Review. Dutch.
-
Long-term results of acetabular reconstruction using irradiated allograft bone.Bone Joint J. 2018 Nov;100-B(11):1449-1454. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.100B11.BJJ-2018-0478.R2. Bone Joint J. 2018. PMID: 30418060 Review.
Cited by
-
How long does a hip replacement last? A systematic review and meta-analysis of case series and national registry reports with more than 15 years of follow-up.Lancet. 2019 Feb 16;393(10172):647-654. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31665-9. Epub 2019 Feb 14. Lancet. 2019. PMID: 30782340 Free PMC article.
-
Revisions of extensive acetabular defects with impaction grafting and a cement cup.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Feb;469(2):562-73. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1618-8. Epub 2010 Oct 8. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011. PMID: 20931308 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Medical