Does the presence of a specialized rehabilitation unit in a Veterans Affairs facility impact referral for rehabilitative care after a lower-extremity amputation?
- PMID: 17908565
- PMCID: PMC3682474
- DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.06.018
Does the presence of a specialized rehabilitation unit in a Veterans Affairs facility impact referral for rehabilitative care after a lower-extremity amputation?
Abstract
Objective: To determine if the presence of specialized rehabilitation units (SRUs) within Veterans Affairs medical centers (VAMC) influences access to rehabilitation services.
Design: Retrospective cohort analysis.
Setting: Two types of VAMCs: those with and without SRUs.
Participants: Veterans with lower-extremity amputations discharged from VAMCs between October 1, 2002, and September 30, 2003. There were a total of 2375 veterans with amputations: 99% were men; and 60% had transtibial, 40% had transfemoral, and less than 1% had hip disarticulation amputations. Nine hundred sixty-six patients (41%) were seen at a VAMC with an SRU.
Interventions: Not applicable.
Main outcome measure: Level of service provided expressed as: no evidence of rehabilitation during the hospitalization, generalized rehabilitation through consultation only, or admission to an SRU.
Results: There were no differences between patients treated at facilities with SRUs and those treated in a facility without SRU beds with respect to age, sex, marital status, source of hospital admission, or level of amputation (all P<.05). Patients with lower initial FIM instrument scores were more likely to be treated in facilities with SRUs, and to have longer lengths of acute hospitalization (P<.01). Patients at facilities with an SRU compared with those without an SRU had comparable likelihoods of being seen for an initial rehabilitation consultation (75% vs 74%, P=.56), but were more likely to be admitted for high intensity specialty rehabilitation services (26% vs 11%, P<.01).
Conclusions: Although the majority of patients were seen in consultation, structural differences in service availability among clinically similar populations appear to be causing access disparities to specialized rehabilitation among amputees in the VAMC setting. The implication of these differences with regard to patient outcomes will need to be determined.
Conflict of interest statement
No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the author(s) or upon any organization with which the author(s) is/are associated.
Similar articles
-
Patient-, treatment-, and facility-level structural characteristics associated with the receipt of preoperative lower extremity amputation rehabilitation.PM R. 2013 Jan;5(1):16-23. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2012.06.009. Epub 2012 Aug 30. PM R. 2013. PMID: 22939239 Free PMC article.
-
Factors influencing receipt of outpatient rehabilitation services among veterans following lower extremity amputation.Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011 Sep;92(9):1455-61. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.03.029. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011. PMID: 21878217 Free PMC article.
-
Factors influencing decisions to admit patients to veterans affairs specialized rehabilitation units after lower-extremity amputation.Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009 Dec;90(12):2012-8. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.07.016. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009. PMID: 19969162 Free PMC article.
-
Lower Limb Amputation Care Across the Active Duty Military and Veteran Populations.Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2019 Feb;30(1):89-109. doi: 10.1016/j.pmr.2018.08.008. Epub 2018 Oct 31. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2019. PMID: 30470431 Review.
-
Principles of contemporary amputation rehabilitation in the United States, 2013.Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2014 Feb;25(1):29-33. doi: 10.1016/j.pmr.2013.09.004. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2014. PMID: 24287237 Review.
Cited by
-
Patient-, treatment-, and facility-level structural characteristics associated with the receipt of preoperative lower extremity amputation rehabilitation.PM R. 2013 Jan;5(1):16-23. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2012.06.009. Epub 2012 Aug 30. PM R. 2013. PMID: 22939239 Free PMC article.
-
Revisiting risks associated with mortality following initial transtibial or transfemoral amputation.J Rehabil Res Dev. 2012;49(10):1479-92. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2012.02.0030. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2012. PMID: 23516052 Free PMC article.
-
The effect of rehabilitation in a comprehensive inpatient rehabilitation unit on mobility outcome after dysvascular lower extremity amputation.Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Aug;93(8):1384-91. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.03.019. Epub 2012 Mar 29. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012. PMID: 22465582 Free PMC article.
-
Factors influencing receipt of outpatient rehabilitation services among veterans following lower extremity amputation.Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011 Sep;92(9):1455-61. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.03.029. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011. PMID: 21878217 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of prosthetic limb prescription on 3-year mortality among Veterans with lower-limb amputation.J Rehabil Res Dev. 2015;52(4):385-96. doi: 10.1682/JRRD.2014.09.0209. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2015. PMID: 26348602 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Fletcher D, Andrews K, Hallett J, Butters M, Rowland C, Jacobsen S. Trends in rehabilitation after amputation for geriatric patients with vascular disease: implications for future health resource allocation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83:1389–93. - PubMed
-
- Pezzin LE, Dillingham TR, MacKenzie EJ. Rehabilitation and the long-term outcomes of persons with trauma-related amputations. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;81:292–300. - PubMed
-
- Dillingham TR, Pezzin LE, MacKenzie EJ. Discharge destination after dysvascular lower-limb amputations. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84:1662–8. - PubMed
-
- Dillingham TR, Pezzin LE. Postacute care services use for dys-vascular amputees. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;84:147–52. - PubMed
-
- Hoenig H, Duncan PW, Horner RD, et al. Structure, process, and outcomes in stroke rehabilitation. Med Care. 2002;40:1036–47. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources