Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2007 Oct;88(10):1339-43.
doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.06.771.

Hyperbaric gaseous cryotherapy: effects on skin temperature and systemic vasoconstriction

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Hyperbaric gaseous cryotherapy: effects on skin temperature and systemic vasoconstriction

Laurent Mourot et al. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007 Oct.

Abstract

Objective: To compare skin-surface cooling caused by the application of an ice bag (15min) and the projection of carbon dioxide microcristals (2min) under high pressure (75 bar) and low temperature (-78 degrees C), a modality called hyperbaric gaseous cryotherapy.

Design: Randomized controlled trial with repeated measure.

Setting: Laboratory experiment.

Participants: Twelve healthy male subjects (mean +/- standard deviation, 22.9+/-1.8y).

Interventions: Ice bag and hyperbaric gaseous cryotherapy were randomly applied on the skin of the nondominant hand.

Main outcome measure: Skin temperature of the cooled (dorsal and palmar sides) and contralateral (dorsal side) hands were continuously measured with thermistor surface-contact probes before, during, and after (30min) cooling.

Results: Hyperbaric gaseous cryotherapy projection induced a large decrease (P<.05) of the dorsal skin temperature of the cooled hand (from 32.5 degrees +/-0.5 degrees C to 7.3 degrees +/-0.8 degrees C) and a significant decrease of the skin temperature of the palmar side and of the contralateral hand. The skin temperature of the dorsal side of the cooled hand was decreased with an ice bag (from 32.5 degrees +/-0.6 degrees C to 13.9 degrees +/-0.7 degrees C, P<.05). However, the lowest temperature was significantly higher than during hyperbaric gaseous cryotherapy, and no significant changes in the other skin temperatures were observed. Rewarming was equal after the 2 modalities, highlighting a more rapid increase of the skin temperature after hyperbaric gaseous cryotherapy.

Conclusions: Hyperbaric gaseous cryotherapy projection decreased the skin temperature of the cooled and contralateral hand, suggesting a systemic skin vasoconstriction response. On the other hand, the vascular responses triggered by ice pack cooling appeared limited and localized to the cooled area.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources