Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2007 Jul 19;12(7):1496-547.
doi: 10.3390/12071496.

Comparative evaluation of various total antioxidant capacity assays applied to phenolic compounds with the CUPRAC assay

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparative evaluation of various total antioxidant capacity assays applied to phenolic compounds with the CUPRAC assay

Reşat Apak et al. Molecules. .

Abstract

It would be desirable to establish and standardize methods that can measure the total antioxidant capacity level directly from vegetable extracts containing phenolics. Antioxidant capacity assays may be broadly classified as electron transfer (ET)- and hydrogen atom transfer (HAT)-based assays. The majority of HAT assays are kinetics-based, and involve a competitive reaction scheme in which antioxidant and substrate compete for peroxyl radicals thermally generated through the decomposition of azo compounds. ET-based assays measure the capacity of an antioxidant in the reduction of an oxidant, which changes colour when reduced. ET assays include the ABTS/TEAC, CUPRAC, DPPH, Folin-Ciocalteu and FRAP methods, each using different chromogenic redox reagents with different standard potentials. This review intends to offer a critical evaluation of existing antioxidant assays applied to phenolics, and reports the development by our research group of a simple and low-cost antioxidant capacity assay for dietary polyphenols, vitamins C and E, and human serum antioxidants, utilizing the copper(II)-neocuproine reagent as the chromogenic oxidizing agent, which we haved named the CUPRAC (cupric ion reducing antioxidant capacity) method. This method offers distinct advantages over other ET-based assays, namely the selection of working pH at physiological pH (as opposed to the Folin and FRAP methods, which work at alkaline and acidic pHs, respectively), applicability to both hydrophilic and lipophilic antioxidants (unlike Folin and DPPH), completion of the redox reactions for most common flavonoids (unlike FRAP), selective oxidation of antioxidant compounds without affecting sugars and citric acid commonly contained in foodstuffs and the capability to assay -SH bearing antioxidants (unlike FRAP). Other similar ET-based antioxidant assays that we have developed or modified for phenolics are the Fe(III)- and Ce(IV)-reducing capacity methods.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Basic plant phenolic structures with examples.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Representative classes of flavonoids
Figure 3
Figure 3
Basic chromophores used in TAC (total antioxidant capacity) assays.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Visible spectra of Cu(I)-Nc chelate produced as a result of CUPRAC reaction with varying concentrations of ascorbic acid.
Figure 5
Figure 5
The formulas of the hydrophilic and lipophilic antioxidants (and of methyl-β-cyclodextrin used in solubility enhancement) tested with the CUPRAC assay.
Figure 6
Figure 6
The correlation of CUPRAC assays results with those of Folin for herbal extracts.
Figure 7
Figure 7
CUPRAC calibration curves of quercetin in grape juice.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bennick A. Interaction of Plant Polyphenols with Salivary Proteins. Crit. Rev. Oral Biol. Med. 2002;13:184–196. doi: 10.1177/154411130201300208. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Robards K., Antolovich M. Analytical Chemistry of Fruit Bioflavonoids. A Review. Analyst. 1997;122:11–34. doi: 10.1039/a606499j. - DOI
    1. Balasundram N., Sundram K., Samman S. Phenolic Compounds in Plants and Agri-Industrial By-Products: Antioxidant Activity, Occurrence, and Potential Uses. Food Chem. 2006;99:191–203. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2005.07.042. - DOI
    1. Harborne J.B., Simmonds N.W. Biochemistry of phenolic compounds. Academic Press; New York: 1964. The natural distribution of the phenolic aglycones; pp. 77–127.
    1. Mehansho H., Butler L.G., Carlson D.M. Dietary Tannins and Salivary Proline-Rich Proteins: Interactions, Induction and Defense Mechanisms. Ann. Rev. Nutr. 1987;7:423–440. doi: 10.1146/annurev.nu.07.070187.002231. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types