An object for an action, the same object for other actions: effects on hand shaping
- PMID: 17909766
- DOI: 10.1007/s00221-007-1136-4
An object for an action, the same object for other actions: effects on hand shaping
Abstract
Objects can be grasped in several ways due to their physical properties, the context surrounding the object, and the goal of the grasping agent. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether the prior-to-contact grasping kinematics of the same object vary as a result of different goals of the person grasping it. Subjects were requested to reach toward and grasp a bottle filled with water, and then complete one of the following tasks: (1) Grasp it without performing any subsequent action; (2) Lift and throw it; (3) Pour the water into a container; (4) Place it accurately on a target area; (5) Pass it to another person. We measured the angular excursions at both metacarpal-phalangeal (mcp) and proximal interphalangeal (pip) joints of all digits, and abduction angles of adjacent digit pairs by means of resistive sensors embedded in a glove. The results showed that the presence and the nature of the task to be performed following grasping affect the positioning of the fingers during the reaching phase. We contend that a one-to-one association between a sensory stimulus and a motor response does not capture all the aspects involved in grasping. The theoretical approach within which we frame our discussion considers internal models of anticipatory control which may provide a suitable explanation of our results.
Similar articles
-
Distractor objects affect fingers' angular distances but not fingers' shaping during grasping.Exp Brain Res. 2007 Apr;178(2):194-205. doi: 10.1007/s00221-006-0723-0. Epub 2006 Oct 19. Exp Brain Res. 2007. PMID: 17051383
-
Effects of end-goal on hand shaping.J Neurophysiol. 2006 Apr;95(4):2456-65. doi: 10.1152/jn.01107.2005. Epub 2005 Dec 28. J Neurophysiol. 2006. PMID: 16381806
-
Control of hand shaping in response to object shape perturbation.Exp Brain Res. 2007 Jun;180(1):85-96. doi: 10.1007/s00221-006-0840-9. Epub 2007 Jan 26. Exp Brain Res. 2007. PMID: 17256167
-
The hand and the object: the role of posterior parietal cortex in forming motor representations.Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 1994 May;72(5):535-41. doi: 10.1139/y94-077. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 1994. PMID: 7954083 Review.
-
Independent control of the digits predicts an apparent hierarchy of visuomotor channels in grasping.Behav Brain Res. 2002 Nov 15;136(2):427-32. doi: 10.1016/s0166-4328(02)00189-4. Behav Brain Res. 2002. PMID: 12429404 Review.
Cited by
-
Sustainable materials: a linking bridge between material perception, affordance, and aesthetics.Front Psychol. 2024 Jan 8;14:1307467. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1307467. eCollection 2023. Front Psychol. 2024. PMID: 38259544 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Differences between kinematic synergies and muscle synergies during two-digit grasping.Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Mar 26;9:165. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00165. eCollection 2015. Front Hum Neurosci. 2015. PMID: 25859208 Free PMC article.
-
Anticipatory action planning in blind and sighted individuals.Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 17;7:44617. doi: 10.1038/srep44617. Sci Rep. 2017. PMID: 28304373 Free PMC article.
-
Motor abundance contributes to resolving multiple kinematic task constraints.Motor Control. 2010 Jan;14(1):83-115. doi: 10.1123/mcj.14.1.83. Motor Control. 2010. PMID: 20237405 Free PMC article.
-
The visible face of intention: why kinematics matters.Front Psychol. 2014 Jul 24;5:815. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00815. eCollection 2014. Front Psychol. 2014. PMID: 25104946 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous