Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Apr;16(4):393-8.
doi: 10.1007/s00520-007-0329-5. Epub 2007 Oct 2.

Retrospective chart review of severe infusion reactions with rituximab, cetuximab, and bevacizumab in community oncology practices: assessment of clinical consequences

Affiliations

Retrospective chart review of severe infusion reactions with rituximab, cetuximab, and bevacizumab in community oncology practices: assessment of clinical consequences

Lee S Schwartzberg et al. Support Care Cancer. 2008 Apr.

Abstract

Goals of work: Monoclonal antibody (MoAb) treatments can result in severe infusion reactions. Managing infusion reactions in the outpatient setting introduces clinical and resource challenges for patients and providers, but there is little information regarding prevention, management, or outcomes of severe infusion reactions. This study represents one of the first attempts to describe the clinical consequences of severe infusion reactions associated with MoAb treatment.

Materials and methods: Clinic staff identified adults treated with rituximab, cetuximab, or bevacizumab who experienced a grade 3 or higher (severe) infusion reaction. Chart reviews from 19 oncology practice sites across the USA captured patient demographics, infusion reaction management procedures, and clinical outcomes.

Main results: With an average age of 62 years, the sample comprised of 76 patients who experienced a severe infusion reaction while receiving rituximab (n = 47), cetuximab (n = 24), and bevacizumab (n = 5). The most common pretreatment medications were acetaminophen and antihistamine in the rituximab group and corticosteroids (42%) in the cetuximab group. All cetuximab and the majority of rituximab severe infusion reactions occurred during the first cycle of therapy. Postinfusion reaction management typically included corticosteroids, oxygen, and intravenous fluids. Overall, 22% were hospitalized for a mean of 4 days (range = 2.0 to 6.0 days). Permanent discontinuation of MoAb therapy occurred after the majority of cetuximab (79 to 100%) related severe infusion reactions.

Conclusions: Severe infusion reactions are intensive events that present a serious challenge to patients and oncology practices. Efforts to prevent or reduce such reactions could be of great benefit.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Support Oncol. 2006 Mar;4(3):147-51 - PubMed
    1. Curr Oncol Rep. 2005 Mar;7(2):96-103 - PubMed
    1. Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz). 2006 Mar-Apr;54(2):85-101 - PubMed
    1. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2005 Nov;5 Suppl 2:S71-80 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Oncol. 1996 Sep;14(9):2612-21 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources