Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2007 Aug;21(9):1055-65; discussion 1065, 1070, 1075 passim.

Targeted therapy in rectal cancer

Affiliations
Review

Targeted therapy in rectal cancer

Christopher G Willett et al. Oncology (Williston Park). 2007 Aug.

Abstract

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) are often overexpressed in colorectal cancer and are associated with inferior outcomes. Based on successful randomized phase III trials, anti-EGFR and anti-VEGF therapeutics have entered clinical practice. Cetuximab (Erbitux), an EGFR-specific antibody, is currently approved in the United States in combination with irinotecan (Camptosar) for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to irinotecan or as a single agent for patients unable to tolerate irinotecan-based therapy. In retrospective analyses, patients with EGFR-expressing rectal cancer undergoing neoadjuvant radiation therapy had a significantly inferior disease-free survival and lower rates of achieving pathologic complete response. Based on the positive data in metastatic colorectal cancer and synergy with radiation therapy seen in preclinical models, there is a strong rationale to combine cetuximab with neoadjuvant radiation therapy and chemotherapy in rectal cancer. Bevacizumab (Avastin), a VEGF-specific antibody, was the first antiangiogenic agent to be approved in the United States for use in combination with standard chemotherapy in the first- and second-line of treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer. VEGF-targeted therapy may lead to indirect killing of cancer cells by damaging tumor blood vessels, and may increase the radiosensitivity of tumor-associated endothelial cells. VEGF blockade can also "normalize" tumor vasculature, thereby leading to greater tumor oxygenation and drug penetration. This review will address completed and ongoing trials that have established and continue to clarify the effects of these agents in rectal cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Clinical Trial of Rectal Cancer Treatment
Schema of protocol employing bevacizumab with radiation therapy and fluorouracil. IFP = interstitial fluid pressure.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Tumor Interstitial Pressure
Endoscopic image showing the interstitial fluid pressure (IFP) measurement in a rectal cancer using the wick-in-needle technique with changes in IFP, which drops at 12 days after bevacizumab infusion alone. Note the consistent decrease in IFP, particularly in patients with high baseline values. Adapted, with permission, from Willett et al.[58,59]
Figure 3
Figure 3. Tumor Microvascular Density
Tumor microvascular density (MVD) and smooth muscle actin (SMA) staining measured in serial biopsies before and after bevacizumab infusion. At day 12, bevacizumab alone reduced MVD approximately by half in all analyzable rectal carcinoma biopsies. Researchers found increased smooth muscle actin staining in tumor vessels demonstrating increased pericyte coverage of remaining vessels. Reproduced, with permission, from Willett et al.[58]
Figure 4
Figure 4. FDG Uptake
Tumor 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake before treatment, after bevacizumab alone, and after completion of neoadjuvant treatment in the first six patients enrolled in the phase I trial. Bevacizumab alone did not significantly reduce FDG uptake, but the combined treatment produced significant reductions in FDG uptake prior to surgery. PET = positron-emission tomography; SUV = standardized uptake value. Reproduced, with permission, from Willett et al.[58]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Response to Treatment
Tumor response to bevacizumab alone and to combination of bevacizumab with chemoradiotherapy. Reproduced, with permission, from Willett et al.[58]

References

    1. Gunderson LL, Sosin H. Areas of failure found at reoperation (second or symptomatic look) following “curative surgery” for adenocarcinoma of the rectum. Clinicopathologic correlation and implications for adjuvant therapy. Cancer. 1974;34:1278–1292. - PubMed
    1. Rich T, Gunderson LL, Lew R, et al. Patterns of recurrence of rectal cancer after potentially curative surgery. Cancer. 1983;52:1317–1329. - PubMed
    1. Prolongation of the disease-free interval in surgically treated rectal carcinoma. Gastrointestinal Tumor Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1985;312:1465–1472. - PubMed
    1. Krook JE, Moertel CG, Gunderson LL, et al. Effective surgical adjuvant therapy for high-risk rectal carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 1991;324:709–715. - PubMed
    1. Wolmark N, Wieand HS, Hyams DM, et al. Randomized trial of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy for carcinoma of the rectum: National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol R-02. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92:388–396. - PubMed

MeSH terms