Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 1991:19 Suppl 6:S337-44.
doi: 10.1007/BF01715775.

Prophylaxis of postoperative infections

Affiliations
Review

Prophylaxis of postoperative infections

D H Wittmann et al. Infection. 1991.

Abstract

The antibiotic most appropriate for prophylaxis of postoperative infections depends on the nature of the operation. In aseptic (clean) operations, gram-positive postoperative infections are the primary concern, and cefazolin is recommended because of its excellent pharmacokinetics and good activity against gram-positive pathogens, including staphylococci. In those operations where violation of the digestive tract creates a contaminated field, a cefotaxime-generation cephalosporin is the agent of choice because of the excellent safety profiles and the capability of agents of this class to kill essentially all pathogenic gram-negative aerobes as well as a substantial portion of anaerobes. Selection of resistant bacteria has not been significant and is unlikely to become so with single-dose prophylaxis. Occasionally, if there is a high probability that the operative field may be heavily contaminated by anaerobes, metronidazole should be added. Dosing should be sufficient to cover the operative period. Only a single prophylactic dose is necessary, given at the time of induction of anesthesia. For particularly long operations, a second dose of those antibiotics with half-lives shorter than 60 min is required two hours after the first. Single-injection prophylaxis is effective, inexpensive, has no side effects and does not induce bacterial resistance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Br J Surg. 1973 Jun;60(6):434-7 - PubMed
    1. Aust N Z J Surg. 1985 Feb;55(1):19-22 - PubMed
    1. Am J Surg. 1989 Nov;158(5):428-33; discussion 433-4 - PubMed
    1. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1956 Aug 31;65(3):85-90 - PubMed
    1. Br J Surg. 1984 Jul;71(7):540-2 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources