Cochlear implants and brain plasticity
- PMID: 17910997
- PMCID: PMC2361156
- DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2007.08.004
Cochlear implants and brain plasticity
Abstract
Cochlear implants have been implanted in over 110,000 deaf adults and children worldwide and provide these patients with important auditory cues necessary for auditory awareness and speech perception via electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve (AN). In 1942, Woolsey and Walzl presented the first report of cortical responses to localised electrical stimulation of different sectors of the AN in normal hearing cats, and established the cochleotopic organization of the projections to primary auditory cortex. Subsequently, individual cortical neurons in normal hearing animals have been shown to have well characterized input-output functions for electrical stimulation and decreasing response latencies with increasing stimulus strength. However, the central auditory system is not immutable, and has a remarkable capacity for plastic change, even into adulthood, as a result of changes in afferent input. This capacity for change is likely to contribute to the ongoing clinical improvements observed in speech perception for cochlear implant users. This review examines the evidence for changes of the response properties of neurons in, and consequently the functional organization of, the central auditory system produced by chronic, behaviourally relevant, electrical stimulation of the AN in profoundly deaf humans and animals.
Figures

Similar articles
-
Assessment of responses to cochlear implant stimulation at different levels of the auditory pathway.Hear Res. 2015 Apr;322:67-76. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2014.10.011. Epub 2014 Nov 4. Hear Res. 2015. PMID: 25445817 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Plasticity of tonotopic maps in humans: influence of hearing loss, hearing aids and cochlear implants.Acta Otolaryngol. 2010 Mar;130(3):333-7. doi: 10.3109/00016480903258024. Acta Otolaryngol. 2010. PMID: 19845491 Review.
-
Cortical reorganization in postlingually deaf cochlear implant users: Intra-modal and cross-modal considerations.Hear Res. 2017 Jan;343:128-137. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2016.07.005. Epub 2016 Jul 26. Hear Res. 2017. PMID: 27473503 Review.
-
Cochlear implant use following neonatal deafness influences the cochleotopic organization of the primary auditory cortex in cats.J Comp Neurol. 2009 Jan 1;512(1):101-14. doi: 10.1002/cne.21886. J Comp Neurol. 2009. PMID: 18972570 Free PMC article.
-
Perfusion SPECT in cochlear implantation and promontory stimulation.Nucl Med Commun. 2004 May;25(5):521-5. doi: 10.1097/00006231-200405000-00015. Nucl Med Commun. 2004. PMID: 15100513 Clinical Trial.
Cited by
-
Cochlear implantation in far-advanced otosclerosis: hearing results and complications.Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2018 Oct;38(5):445-452. doi: 10.14639/0392-100X-1442. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2018. PMID: 30498273 Free PMC article.
-
Cochlear implants matching the prosthesis to the brain and facilitating desired plastic changes in brain function.Prog Brain Res. 2011;194:117-29. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-53815-4.00012-1. Prog Brain Res. 2011. PMID: 21867799 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Layered nanocomposites from gold nanoparticles for neural prosthetic devices.Nano Lett. 2012 Jul 11;12(7):3391-8. doi: 10.1021/nl3015632. Epub 2012 Jun 26. Nano Lett. 2012. PMID: 22734673 Free PMC article.
-
A brain-machine interface instructed by direct intracortical microstimulation.Front Integr Neurosci. 2009 Sep 1;3:20. doi: 10.3389/neuro.07.020.2009. eCollection 2009. Front Integr Neurosci. 2009. PMID: 19750199 Free PMC article.
-
Early Deafened, Late Implanted Cochlear Implant Users Appreciate Music More Than and Identify Music as Well as Postlingual Users.Front Neurosci. 2019 Oct 11;13:1050. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2019.01050. eCollection 2019. Front Neurosci. 2019. PMID: 31680802 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Bao S, Chang EF, Woods J, Merzenich MM. Temporal plasticity in the primary auditory cortex induced by operant perceptual learning. Nature Neuroscience. 2004;7:974–981. - PubMed
-
- Berthezene Y, Truy E, Morgon A, Giard MH, Hermier M, Franconi JM, Froment JC. Auditory cortex activation in deaf subjects during cochlear electrical stimulation. Evaluation by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Radiol. 1997;32:297–301. - PubMed
-
- Blamey P, Arndt P, Bergeron F, Bredberg G, Brimacombe J, Facer G, Larky J, Lindstrom B, Nedzelski J, Peterson A, Shipp D, Staller S, Whitford L. Factors affecting auditory performance of postlinguistically deaf adults using cochlear implants. Audiol Neurootol. 1996;1:293–306. - PubMed
-
- Blamey PJ, Sarant JZ, Paatsch LE, Barry JG, Bow CP, Wales RJ, Wright M, Psarros C, Rattigan K, Tooher R. Relationships among speech perception, production, language, hearing loss, and age in children with impaired hearing. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2001;44:264–285. - PubMed
-
- Busby PA, Clark GM. Gap detection by early-deafened cochlear-implant subjects. J Acoust Soc Am. 1999;105:1841–1852. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous