Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2008 Apr;238(1-2):110-7.
doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2007.08.004. Epub 2007 Sep 1.

Cochlear implants and brain plasticity

Affiliations
Review

Cochlear implants and brain plasticity

James B Fallon et al. Hear Res. 2008 Apr.

Abstract

Cochlear implants have been implanted in over 110,000 deaf adults and children worldwide and provide these patients with important auditory cues necessary for auditory awareness and speech perception via electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve (AN). In 1942, Woolsey and Walzl presented the first report of cortical responses to localised electrical stimulation of different sectors of the AN in normal hearing cats, and established the cochleotopic organization of the projections to primary auditory cortex. Subsequently, individual cortical neurons in normal hearing animals have been shown to have well characterized input-output functions for electrical stimulation and decreasing response latencies with increasing stimulus strength. However, the central auditory system is not immutable, and has a remarkable capacity for plastic change, even into adulthood, as a result of changes in afferent input. This capacity for change is likely to contribute to the ongoing clinical improvements observed in speech perception for cochlear implant users. This review examines the evidence for changes of the response properties of neurons in, and consequently the functional organization of, the central auditory system produced by chronic, behaviourally relevant, electrical stimulation of the AN in profoundly deaf humans and animals.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic representations of the cochleotopic organisation of the inferior colliculus (middle) and primary auditory cortex (right) in normal hearing animals (top row), congenitally deaf unstimulated animals (second row), neonatally deafened unstimulated animals (third row) and chronically-deaf chronically-stimulated animals (bottom row). The different results obtained with different recording techniques (optical imaging or electrophysiological) are illustrated.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bao S, Chang EF, Woods J, Merzenich MM. Temporal plasticity in the primary auditory cortex induced by operant perceptual learning. Nature Neuroscience. 2004;7:974–981. - PubMed
    1. Berthezene Y, Truy E, Morgon A, Giard MH, Hermier M, Franconi JM, Froment JC. Auditory cortex activation in deaf subjects during cochlear electrical stimulation. Evaluation by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Radiol. 1997;32:297–301. - PubMed
    1. Blamey P, Arndt P, Bergeron F, Bredberg G, Brimacombe J, Facer G, Larky J, Lindstrom B, Nedzelski J, Peterson A, Shipp D, Staller S, Whitford L. Factors affecting auditory performance of postlinguistically deaf adults using cochlear implants. Audiol Neurootol. 1996;1:293–306. - PubMed
    1. Blamey PJ, Sarant JZ, Paatsch LE, Barry JG, Bow CP, Wales RJ, Wright M, Psarros C, Rattigan K, Tooher R. Relationships among speech perception, production, language, hearing loss, and age in children with impaired hearing. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2001;44:264–285. - PubMed
    1. Busby PA, Clark GM. Gap detection by early-deafened cochlear-implant subjects. J Acoust Soc Am. 1999;105:1841–1852. - PubMed

Publication types