Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Oct;16(5):349-53.
doi: 10.1136/qshc.2006.019158.

Shared medical appointments based on the chronic care model: a quality improvement project to address the challenges of patients with diabetes with high cardiovascular risk

Affiliations

Shared medical appointments based on the chronic care model: a quality improvement project to address the challenges of patients with diabetes with high cardiovascular risk

Susan Kirsh et al. Qual Saf Health Care. 2007 Oct.

Abstract

Objective: The epidemic proportions and management complexity of diabetes have prompted efforts to improve clinic throughput and efficiency. One method of system redesign based on the chronic care model is the Shared Medical Appointment (SMA) in which groups of patients (8-20) are seen by a multi-disciplinary team in a 1-2 h appointment. Evaluation of the impact of SMAs on quality of care has been limited. The purpose of this quality improvement project was to improve intermediate outcome measures for diabetes (A1c, SBP, LDL-cholesterol) focusing on those patients at highest cardiovascular risk.

Setting: Primary care clinic at a tertiary care academic medical center.

Subjects: Patients with diabetes with one or more of the following: A1c >9%, SBP blood pressure >160 mm Hg and LDL-c >130 mg/dl were targeted for potential participation; other patients were referred by their primary care providers. Patients participated in at least one SMA from 4/05 to 9/05.

Study design: Quasi-experimental with concurrent, but non-randomised controls (patients who participated in SMAs from 5/06 through 8/06; a retrospective period of observation prior to their SMA participation was used).

Intervention: SMA system redesign. ANALYTICAL METHODS: Paired and independent t tests, chi(2) tests and Fisher Exact tests.

Results: Each group had up to 8 patients. Patients participated in 1-7 visits. At the initial visit, 83.3% had A1c levels >9%, 30.6% had LDL-cholesterol levels >130 mg/dl, and 34.1% had SBP >or=160 mm Hg. Levels of A1c, LDL-c and SBP all fell significantly postintervention with a mean (95% CI) decrease of A1c 1.4 (0.8, 2.1) (p<0.001), LDL-c 14.8 (2.3, 27.4) (p = 0.022) and SBP 16.0 (9.7, 22.3) (p<0.001). There were no significant differences at baseline between control and intervention groups in terms of age, baseline intermediate outcomes, or medication use. The reductions in A1c in % and SBP were greater in the intervention group relative to the control group: 1.44 vs -0.30 (p = 0.002) for A1c and 14.83 vs 2.54 mm Hg (p = 0.04) for SBP. LDL-c reduction was also greater in the intervention group, 16.0 vs 5.37 mg/dl, but the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.29).

Conclusions: We were able to initiate a programme of group visits in which participants achieved benefits in terms of cardiovascular risk reduction. Some barriers needed to be addressed, and the operations of SMAs evolved over time. Shared medical appointments for diabetes constitute a practical system redesign that may help to improve quality of care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. King H, Aubert R, Herman H. Global burden of diabetes, 1995–2025: Prevalence, numerical estimates and projects. Diabetes Care 1997211414–1431. - PubMed
    1. Rizza R, Vigersky R, Rodbard H.et al A model to determine workforce needs for endocrinologists in the United States until 2020. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2003881979–1987. - PubMed
    1. Noffsinger E. Increasing quality care and access while reducing cost through drop‐in group medical appointments (DIGMAs). Group Pract J 19994812–18.
    1. Noffsinger E, Scott J. Understanding today's group visit models. Group Pract J 2000Feb46–58.
    1. Sadur C, Moline N, Costa M.et al Diabetes mangement in a health maintenance organization. Efficacy of care management using cluster visits. Diabetes Care 1999222011–2017. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances