Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Nov;18(5):1335-9.

Local control in 118 consecutive high-risk breast cancer patients treated with breast-conserving therapy

Affiliations
  • PMID: 17914594

Local control in 118 consecutive high-risk breast cancer patients treated with breast-conserving therapy

Dirk Vordermark et al. Oncol Rep. 2007 Nov.

Abstract

Although negative surgical margins are an important prognostic factor in the breast-conserving treatment of breast cancer, the required width of these margins is still under debate. To define the risk of in-breast recurrence in subgroups of patients with a local high-risk situation, local control was evaluated in all patients with close or positive margins treated at one institution between 1995 and 2000. A total of 118 patients (67% T1, 30% T2, 52% N0) were identified as having had positive or close margins (< or =4 mm) at the time of initial surgery. Of these, 65% had no tumor cells at the initial margin, 35% had a positive or questionable margin. Re-excisions were performed in 42%. The median (range) whole-breast radiotherapy dose, tumor bed boost dose and total dose were 50 (46.8-56) Gy, 15 (8-20) Gy and 65.8 (54-71) Gy, respectively. Thirty-six percent received adjuvant chemotherapy. Local (in-breast) control was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared between subgroups. The 5-year local control for the whole group was 94%. The rates for selected subgroups were: <56 years 89.4% vs. >56 years 98.1% (p=0.073, univariate analysis); pT1 95.9% vs. pT2 88.6% (not significant, n.s.); pN0 96.6% vs. pN+ 90.8% (n.s.); initial margin free of tumor cells 95.5% vs. initial margin involved or questionable 90.7% (n.s.), no re-excision 96.7% vs. one or more re-excisions 90.6% (n.s.); adjuvant chemotherapy 81.7% vs. no adjuvant chemotherapy 100% (p=0.007). We conclude that among patients with close or positive margins, older patients achieved high local control rates with a median tumorbed boost to 66 Gy. Younger patients and patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy (due to the presence of histopathological risk factors) were at increased risk of in-breast recurrence and should be considered for intensified local treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources