Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007;27(11):755-64.
doi: 10.2165/00044011-200727110-00002.

Economic evaluation of third-line treatment with alemtuzumab for chronic lymphocytic leukaemia

Affiliations

Economic evaluation of third-line treatment with alemtuzumab for chronic lymphocytic leukaemia

W Guy Scott et al. Clin Drug Investig. 2007.

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to compare the potential economic efficiency of third-line treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) with alemtuzumab versus fludarabine, cyclophosphamide and rituximab (FCR).

Methods: The target population for this study were patients with CLL who were able to tolerate third-line treatment with either FCR or alemtuzumab. The perspective used was that of the New Zealand Pharmaceutical Management Agency (PHARMAC)/District Health Board. Health outcomes considered were survival time from commencement of treatment and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained. Average costs and outcomes and incremental cost per patient treated, per survival month and per QALY gained, were calculated. All costs were presented in 2006 New Zealand dollars.

Results: Base-case direct medical costs for alemtuzumab per treatment regimen per patient were $NZ15 303 lower than those for FCR. The average direct medical cost per survival month gained for alemtuzumab was $NZ3144 and for FCR was $NZ4101, and the average direct medical cost per QALY gained was $NZ46,016 and for FCR was $NZ60,012.

Conclusion: Third-line treatment of eligible patients with alemtuzumab was found to be $NZ15,303 less costly than FCR per patient.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Support Care Cancer. 2002 Nov;10(8):624-9 - PubMed
    1. Eur J Cancer. 1996 Aug;32A(9):1510-7 - PubMed
    1. BioDrugs. 2005;19(1):9-22 - PubMed
    1. Leuk Lymphoma. 2002 Sep;43(9):1755-62 - PubMed
    1. Br J Haematol. 2004 May;125(3):294-317 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources