Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Oct 4:2:32.
doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-2-32.

Taking stock of current societal, political and academic stakeholders in the Canadian healthcare knowledge translation agenda

Affiliations

Taking stock of current societal, political and academic stakeholders in the Canadian healthcare knowledge translation agenda

Mandi S Newton et al. Implement Sci. .

Abstract

Background: In the past 15 years, knowledge translation in healthcare has emerged as a multifaceted and complex agenda. Theoretical and polemical discussions, the development of a science to study and measure the effects of translating research evidence into healthcare, and the role of key stakeholders including academe, healthcare decision-makers, the public, and government funding bodies have brought scholarly, organizational, social, and political dimensions to the agenda.

Objective: This paper discusses the current knowledge translation agenda in Canadian healthcare and how elements in this agenda shape the discovery and translation of health knowledge.

Discussion: The current knowledge translation agenda in Canadian healthcare involves the influence of values, priorities, and people; stakes which greatly shape the discovery of research knowledge and how it is or is not instituted in healthcare delivery. As this agenda continues to take shape and direction, ensuring that it is accountable for its influences is essential and should be at the forefront of concern to the Canadian public and healthcare community. This transparency will allow for scrutiny, debate, and improvements in health knowledge discovery and health services delivery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sung N. Central challenges facing the national clinical research enterprise. JAMA. 2003;289:1278–1287. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.10.1278. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Graham ID, Tetroe J. How to translate health research knowledge into effective healthcare action. Healthc Q. 2007;10:20–22. - PubMed
    1. Grol R. Successes and failures in the implementation of evidence-based guidelines for clinical practice. Med Care. 2001;39:II46–II54. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200108002-00003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schuster M, McGlynn E, Brook RH. How good is the quality of health care in the United States? Milbank Quarterly. 1998;76:517–563. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.00105. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. McGlynn EA, Asch SM, Adams J, Keesey J, Hicks J, DeCristofaro D, Kerr EA. The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. NEJM. 2003;348:2635–2645. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa022615. - DOI - PubMed