Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007;24(4):425-30.
doi: 10.1007/s12032-007-0033-9.

Prognostic factors for malignant pericardial effusion treated by pericardial drainage in solid-malignancy patients

Affiliations

Prognostic factors for malignant pericardial effusion treated by pericardial drainage in solid-malignancy patients

Kan Yonemori et al. Med Oncol. 2007.

Abstract

Purpose: Malignant pericardial effusion is a frequent complication of advanced incurable malignancies and requires treatment. The purpose of this study was to identify prognostic factors for cytology-positive malignant pericardial effusion in patients treated by pericardial drainage.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed a series of consecutive patients diagnosed with cytologically positive malignant pericardial effusion who were treated by pericardial drainage at the National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo.

Results: A total of 88 patients with pericardial effusion were treated by pericardial drainage, 60 patients were diagnosed with cytological positive malignant pericardial effusion including 32 with non-small cell lung cancer, 13 with breast cancer, 8 with gastrointestinal cancer, and 7 with miscellaneous cancers. Subxiphoid pericardiostomy was performed in 50 of the patients and percutaneous tube pericardiostomy in the other 10 patients. Malignant pericardial effusion recurred in 14 patients, and pericardial drainage was performed again in 9 of them. The median overall survival time was 6.1 months, and the 1-year survival rate was 28%. A multivariate analysis revealed the following significant negative prognostic factors: performance status, development of malignant pericardial effusion during chemotherapy, mediastinal lymph node enlargement, and cytologic type. (P = 0.03, 0.02, 0.01, 0.001, respectively).

Conclusion: Patients with poor prognostic factors may be better to consider as indication of palliative therapy, even if oncologic emergency had been resolved rapidly by drainage.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cancer. 1992 Jul 15;70(2):437-42 - PubMed
    1. Cancer. 1993 Jan 1;71(1):93-8 - PubMed
    1. Am J Cardiol. 1987 Nov 15;60(14):1161-6 - PubMed
    1. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999 Feb;67(2):437-40 - PubMed
    1. Cancer. 1987 Jul 15;60(2):263-9 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources