The relation between post concussion symptoms and neurocognitive performance in concussed athletes
- PMID: 17917171
The relation between post concussion symptoms and neurocognitive performance in concussed athletes
Abstract
The objective of this study was to examine differences in neurocognitive performance between symptomatic concussed athletes, a group of concussed athletes with no subjective symptoms, and a non-concussed control group of athletes. All concussed athletes were evaluated within one week of injury using the ImPACT computerized test battery. Results indicate that concussed athletes who denied subjective symptoms demonstrated poorer performance than control subjects on all four composite scores of the ImPACT test batters (Verbal Memory, Visual Memory, Reaction Time and Processing Speed However, the concussed but asymptomatic group demonstrated significantly better performance than did the concussed and symptomatic group. Thus, concussed athletes who did not report subjective symptoms were not fully recovered based on neurocognitive testing. This study underscores the importance of neurocognitive testing in the assessment of concussion sequelae and recovery.
Similar articles
-
Sex differences in neuropsychological function and post-concussion symptoms of concussed collegiate athletes.Neurosurgery. 2007 Aug;61(2):345-50; discussion 350-1. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000279972.95060.CB. Neurosurgery. 2007. PMID: 17762747
-
Assessing the enduring residual neuropsychological effects of head trauma in college athletes who participate in contact sports.Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2005 Jul;20(5):599-611. doi: 10.1016/j.acn.2005.02.001. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2005. PMID: 15939185
-
Sensitivity and specificity of the ImPACT Test Battery for concussion in athletes.Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2006 Jan;21(1):91-9. doi: 10.1016/j.acn.2005.08.001. Epub 2005 Sep 6. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2006. PMID: 16143492 Clinical Trial.
-
Use of computer based testing of youth hockey players with concussions.NeuroRehabilitation. 2007;22(3):169-79. NeuroRehabilitation. 2007. PMID: 17917167 Review.
-
Use of neuropsychological evaluations.Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2011 Nov;22(4):653-64, viii. doi: 10.1016/j.pmr.2011.08.006. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2011. PMID: 22050941 Review.
Cited by
-
A normative study of the sport concussion assessment tool (SCAT2) in children and adolescents.Clin Neuropsychol. 2014;28(7):1091-103. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2014.952667. Epub 2014 Sep 22. Clin Neuropsychol. 2014. PMID: 25244434 Free PMC article.
-
Concussions: What a neurosurgeon should know about current scientific evidence and management strategies.Surg Neurol Int. 2012;3:16. doi: 10.4103/2152-7806.92930. Epub 2012 Feb 15. Surg Neurol Int. 2012. PMID: 22439107 Free PMC article.
-
Using sideline concussion tests in the emergency department.Open Access Emerg Med. 2018 Sep 26;10:113-121. doi: 10.2147/OAEM.S165995. eCollection 2018. Open Access Emerg Med. 2018. PMID: 30288131 Free PMC article.
-
If You're Not Measuring, You're Guessing: The Advent of Objective Concussion Assessments.J Athl Train. 2017 Mar;52(3):160-166. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-51.9.05. J Athl Train. 2017. PMID: 28387562 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Validity of the Immediate Post Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT).Sports Med. 2016 Oct;46(10):1487-501. doi: 10.1007/s40279-016-0532-y. Sports Med. 2016. PMID: 27071989
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical