Comparison of the levels of accuracy of an artificial neural network model and a logistic regression model for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis
- PMID: 17918689
- DOI: 10.1007/s10916-007-9077-9
Comparison of the levels of accuracy of an artificial neural network model and a logistic regression model for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis
Abstract
An accurate diagnosis of acute appendicitis in the early stage is often difficult, and decision support tools to improve such a diagnosis might be required. This study compared the levels of accuracy of artificial neural network models and logistic regression models for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Data from 169 patients presenting with acute abdomen were used for the analyses. Nine variables were used for the evaluation of the accuracy of the two models. The constructed models were validated by the ".632+ bootstrap method". The levels of accuracy of the two models for diagnosis were compared by error rate and areas under receiver operating characteristic curves. The artificial neural network models provided more accurate results than did the logistic regression models for both indices, especially when categorical variables or normalized variables were used. The most accurate diagnosis was obtained by the artificial neural network model using normalized variables.
Similar articles
-
Accuracy in the diagnostic prediction of acute appendicitis based on the Bayesian network model.Methods Inf Med. 2007;46(6):723-6. Methods Inf Med. 2007. PMID: 18066425
-
Acute appendicitis diagnosis using artificial neural networks.Technol Health Care. 2015;23 Suppl 2:S559-65. doi: 10.3233/THC-150994. Technol Health Care. 2015. PMID: 26410524
-
Diagnostic accuracy of inflammatory markers in patients operated on for suspected acute appendicitis: a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.Eur J Surg. 1999 Jul;165(7):679-85. doi: 10.1080/11024159950189744. Eur J Surg. 1999. PMID: 10452263
-
Additional value of biochemical tests in suspected acute appendicitis.Eur J Surg. 1997 Jul;163(7):533-8. Eur J Surg. 1997. PMID: 9248988 Clinical Trial.
-
Ultrasound with graded compression in the evaluation of acute appendicitis.J Natl Med Assoc. 1989 Sep;81(9):954-7. J Natl Med Assoc. 1989. PMID: 2674464 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Machine learning to guide clinical decision-making in abdominal surgery-a systematic literature review.Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2022 Feb;407(1):51-61. doi: 10.1007/s00423-021-02348-w. Epub 2021 Oct 29. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2022. PMID: 34716472 Free PMC article.
-
Classification Performance of Neural Networks Versus Logistic Regression Models: Evidence From Healthcare Practice.Cureus. 2022 Feb 21;14(2):e22443. doi: 10.7759/cureus.22443. eCollection 2022 Feb. Cureus. 2022. PMID: 35345728 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Mortality predicted accuracy for hepatocellular carcinoma patients with hepatic resection using artificial neural network.ScientificWorldJournal. 2013 Apr 30;2013:201976. doi: 10.1155/2013/201976. Print 2013. ScientificWorldJournal. 2013. PMID: 23737707 Free PMC article.
-
An approach to model Right Iliac Fossa pain using pain-only-parameters for screening acute appendicitis.J Med Syst. 2012 Jun;36(3):1491-502. doi: 10.1007/s10916-010-9610-0. Epub 2010 Oct 15. J Med Syst. 2012. PMID: 20949312
-
Artificial Intelligence and Acute Appendicitis: A Systematic Review of Diagnostic and Prognostic Models.World J Emerg Surg. 2023 Dec 19;18(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s13017-023-00527-2. World J Emerg Surg. 2023. PMID: 38114983 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical