Why total hip resurfacing
- PMID: 17919595
- DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2007.05.050
Why total hip resurfacing
Abstract
Improvements in materials and fixation have addressed many of the limitations of resurfacing total hip arthroplasty (THA). The functional demands and the longevity of arthroplasty patients are increasing. Many patients have embraced the functional capacity, bone conservation, and revision options of hip resurfacing. Young men have historically been at increased risk for failure of total THA. In this patient subgroup, the survivorship of hybrid metal-metal resurfacing THA has been demonstrated to exceed that of THA, but patient selection is critical. The procedure is now also conservative on the acetabular side, and revision of the cementless acetabular component is rare. The operative parameters of femoral resurfacing revisions (conversion to a THA) are similar to that of a primary THA. Bearing technology will continue to evolve.
Similar articles
-
The optimal metal-metal arthroplasty is still a total hip arthroplasty: in the affirmative.J Arthroplasty. 2006 Jun;21(4 Suppl 1):74-6. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2006.02.091. J Arthroplasty. 2006. PMID: 16781434
-
Resurfacing matched to standard total hip arthroplasty by preoperative activity levels - a comparison of postoperative outcomes.Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2009;67(2):116-9. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2009. PMID: 19583537
-
Comparison of bone removed during total hip arthroplasty with a resurfacing or conventional femoral component: a cadaveric study.J Arthroplasty. 2010 Feb;25(2):325-9. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2008.10.004. Epub 2008 Dec 3. J Arthroplasty. 2010. PMID: 19056234
-
Metal-on-metal surface replacement: a triumph of hope over reason: affirms.Orthopedics. 2011 Sep 9;34(9):e439-41. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20110714-21. Orthopedics. 2011. PMID: 21902124 Review.
-
Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: a skeptic's view.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007 Dec;465:86-91. doi: 10.1097/BLO.0b013e3181468911. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007. PMID: 17632416 Review.
Cited by
-
Reduced articular surface of one-piece cups: a cause of runaway wear and early failure.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Sep;468(9):2328-32. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1383-8. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010. PMID: 20480405 Free PMC article.
-
Survivorship and clinical outcome of Birmingham hip resurfacing: a minimum ten years' follow-up.Int Orthop. 2016 Jan;40(1):1-7. doi: 10.1007/s00264-015-2731-9. Epub 2015 Mar 31. Int Orthop. 2016. PMID: 25820838
-
[Biomechanical aspects of the implant fixation and kinematics of hip resurfacing systems].Orthopade. 2008 Jul;37(7):634-43. doi: 10.1007/s00132-008-1285-6. Orthopade. 2008. PMID: 18548228 Review. German.
-
Does hip resurfacing require larger acetabular cups than conventional THA?Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Apr;467(4):923-8. doi: 10.1007/s11999-008-0689-2. Epub 2009 Jan 14. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009. PMID: 19142691 Free PMC article.
-
The learning curve for adopting hip resurfacing among hip specialists.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Feb;468(2):382-91. doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-1106-1. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010. PMID: 19779950 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical