Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Jan;77(1):11-9.
doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2007.08.008. Epub 2007 Aug 31.

Fetal responses to induced maternal relaxation during pregnancy

Affiliations

Fetal responses to induced maternal relaxation during pregnancy

Janet A DiPietro et al. Biol Psychol. 2008 Jan.

Abstract

Fetal responses to induced maternal relaxation during the 32nd week of pregnancy were recorded in 100 maternal-fetal pairs using a digitized data collection system. The 18-min guided imagery relaxation manipulation generated significant changes in maternal heart rate, skin conductance, respiration period, and respiratory sinus arrhythmia. Significant alterations in fetal neurobehavior were observed, including decreased fetal heart rate (FHR), increased FHR variability, suppression of fetal motor activity (FM), and increased FM-FHR coupling. Attribution of the two fetal cardiac responses to the guided imagery procedure itself, as opposed to simple rest or recumbency, is tempered by the observed pattern of response. Evaluation of correspondence between changes within individual maternal-fetal pairs revealed significant associations between maternal autonomic measures and fetal cardiac patterns, lower umbilical and uterine artery resistance and increased FHR variability, and declining salivary cortisol and FM activity. Potential mechanisms that may mediate the observed results are discussed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Although fetal heart rate (bpm) changed significantly over time, F (2,194) = 3.07, p < .05, the change between segments was limited to the baseline to relaxation periods for the group without a pre-baseline period only, F (1, 56) = 12.03, ***p < .001. Unlike other figures, significance notation here refers to this group only.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Fetal heart rate variability (bpm) showed linear increase over time, F (2, 194) = 5.81, p < .01, but change between segments was focused on the baseline period to relaxation, F (1,98) = 8.65, **p < .01.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Fetal movement (arbitrary units) suppression was displayed during the relaxation period with return to baseline levels following the recovery period; this pattern was unaffected by pre-baseline condition. ***p < .0001.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Fetal FM-FHR coupling was augmented during the relaxation period and returned to baseline levels following the recovery period; this pattern was unaffected by pre-baseline condition. **p < .01. ***p < .001.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Akram K, Zaman K, Mazumber Y, Filteau S, Roy S, Siddique A. Perception and practice of rest during pregnancy among mothers and family decision makers. Journal of Tropical Pediatrics. 2000;46:311–313. - PubMed
    1. Baser I, Johnson TRB, Paine LL. Coupling of fetal movement and fetal heart rate accelerations as an indicator of fetal health. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1992;80:62–66. - PubMed
    1. Bastani F, Hidarnia A, Montgomery KS, Aquilar-Vafaei ME, Kazemnejad A. Does relaxation education in anxious primigravid Iranian women influence adverse pregnancy outcomes? A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Perinatal and Neonatal Nursing. 2006;20:138–146. - PubMed
    1. Benson P, Little BC, Talbert DG, Dewhurst J, Priest RG. Foetal heart rate and maternal emotional state. British Journal of Medical Psychology. 1987;60:151–154. - PubMed
    1. Besinger RE, Johnson TRB. Doppler recordings of fetal movement: Clinical correlation with real-time ultrasound. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1989;74:277–280. - PubMed

Publication types