Preferences for symmetry in faces change across the menstrual cycle
- PMID: 17919806
- DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2007.08.003
Preferences for symmetry in faces change across the menstrual cycle
Abstract
Symmetry in human male faces may be a cue to heritable fitness benefits and is found attractive. Preferences for facial masculinity, another proposed marker of genetic quality, have been found to vary in ways that may maximise evolutionary relevant benefits and masculinity is found to be of increased attractiveness at peak fertility across the menstrual cycle. Here we show that women prefer more symmetric faces at peak fertility (Study 1) and that such shifting preferences may be potentially strategic preferences as we found them to occur only for judgements concerning short-term relations and when women already had a partner (Study 2). Such preferences potentially indicate a strategy that maximises the quality of extra-pair/short-term partners or a quality dependent response to hormones. Such strategic preferences for symmetry may support the role of symmetry in signalling potential good-gene benefits.
Similar articles
-
Preferences for masculinity in male bodies change across the menstrual cycle.Horm Behav. 2007 May;51(5):633-9. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2007.03.006. Epub 2007 Mar 24. Horm Behav. 2007. PMID: 17466990
-
Variation in facial masculinity and symmetry preferences across the menstrual cycle is moderated by relationship context.Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2012 Jul;37(7):999-1008. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2011.11.007. Epub 2011 Dec 15. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2012. PMID: 22172641 Clinical Trial.
-
Women's preferences for masculinity in male faces are highest during reproductive age range and lower around puberty and post-menopause.Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2010 Jul;35(6):912-20. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2009.12.006. Epub 2010 Jan 8. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2010. PMID: 20060226
-
Effects of menstrual cycle phase on face preferences.Arch Sex Behav. 2008 Feb;37(1):78-84. doi: 10.1007/s10508-007-9268-y. Arch Sex Behav. 2008. PMID: 18193349 Review.
-
Psychobiology of facial attractiveness.J Endocrinol Invest. 2003;26(3 Suppl):45-8. J Endocrinol Invest. 2003. PMID: 12834020 Review.
Cited by
-
Social exclusion and female mating behavior: rejected women show strategic enhancement of short-term mating interest.Evol Psychol. 2012 Aug 22;10(3):573-87. doi: 10.1177/147470491201000313. Evol Psychol. 2012. PMID: 22947679 Free PMC article.
-
Sex and Physiological Cycles Affect the Automatic Perception of Attractive Opposite-Sex Faces: A Visual Mismatch Negativity Study.Evol Psychol. 2018 Oct-Dec;16(4):1474704918812140. doi: 10.1177/1474704918812140. Evol Psychol. 2018. PMID: 30463433 Free PMC article.
-
Does my face FIT?: a face image task reveals structure and distortions of facial feature representation.PLoS One. 2013 Oct 9;8(10):e76805. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076805. eCollection 2013. PLoS One. 2013. PMID: 24130790 Free PMC article.
-
Facial Attractiveness of Chinese College Students With Different Sexual Orientation and Sex Roles.Front Hum Neurosci. 2019 Apr 30;13:132. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00132. eCollection 2019. Front Hum Neurosci. 2019. PMID: 31114490 Free PMC article.
-
Cycle-specific female preferences for visual and non-visual cues in the horse (Equus caballus).PLoS One. 2018 Feb 21;13(2):e0191845. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191845. eCollection 2018. PLoS One. 2018. PMID: 29466358 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources