Photographic soft-tissue profile analysis in children at 6 years of age
- PMID: 17920500
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.10.029
Photographic soft-tissue profile analysis in children at 6 years of age
Abstract
Introduction: Profile photographs can be a valuable, noninvasive tool for early orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning.
Methods: Left-side profile photographs were obtained of 181 normal, healthy children at age 6 years. Standardized landmarks were digitized on the photographs, and several linear and angular measurements were computed. The children were divided according to dental class and sex. Comparisons were made by 2-way analyses of variance.
Results: Facial convexity (larger in boys than in girls), Sn-N-Sl, and nasolabial and interlabial angles differed significantly (P <.01) between the sexes. Girls had significantly less labial protrusion than boys. Facial height was significantly greater in children with dental Class II, without sex differences. All analyzed angles were significantly influenced by dental class. Facial convexity was smaller in children with dental Class II. Cutaneous class was larger, and lips were more prominent in children with dental Class II than in those with dental Class III.
Conclusions: The significant relationship between dental and cutaneous classes has important implications for orthodontic diagnosis and treatment. Dental class can usefully represent facial esthetics, and orthodontic procedures that modify dental occlusion might cause important repercussions to facial soft tissues.
Similar articles
-
Analysis of the soft tissue facial profile by means of angular measurements.Eur J Orthod. 2008 Apr;30(2):135-40. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjm116. Epub 2008 Feb 8. Eur J Orthod. 2008. PMID: 18263886
-
Comparison of soft tissue facial morphometry in children with Class I and Class II occlusions.Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 1994;9(3):187-94. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 1994. PMID: 7814923
-
Angular photogrammetric analysis of the soft tissue facial profile of Turkish adults.Eur J Orthod. 2009 Apr;31(2):174-9. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjn082. Epub 2008 Dec 8. Eur J Orthod. 2009. PMID: 19064675
-
[Facial analysis without cephalometric radiography].Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd. 2000 Apr;107(4):141-4. Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd. 2000. PMID: 11382969 Review. Dutch.
-
[Evolution of the convexity of tegumental profile during mixed dentition].Bacteriol Virusol Parazitol Epidemiol. 2004 Jul-Dec;49(3-4):187-93. Bacteriol Virusol Parazitol Epidemiol. 2004. PMID: 16938941 Review. Romanian.
Cited by
-
Accuracy and reliability of 3D stereophotogrammetry: A comparison to direct anthropometry and 2D photogrammetry.Angle Orthod. 2016 May;86(3):487-94. doi: 10.2319/041415-244.1. Epub 2015 Aug 12. Angle Orthod. 2016. PMID: 26267357 Free PMC article.
-
Photographic assessment of cephalometric measurements.Angle Orthod. 2013 Nov;83(6):1049-58. doi: 10.2319/120712-925.1. Epub 2013 Apr 18. Angle Orthod. 2013. PMID: 23597034 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative assessment of cephalometric with its analogous photographic variables.Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2022 Jan-Apr;13(1):99-107. doi: 10.4103/njms.NJMS_267_20. Epub 2022 Apr 20. Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2022. PMID: 35911811 Free PMC article.
-
Innovative Aesthetic and Functional Orthodontic Planning with Hard and Soft Tissue Analyses.J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 23;14(13):4458. doi: 10.3390/jcm14134458. J Clin Med. 2025. PMID: 40648832 Free PMC article.
-
Reliability of reference distances used in photogrammetry.Angle Orthod. 2010 Jul;80(4):482-9. doi: 10.2319/070309-372.1. Angle Orthod. 2010. PMID: 20482352 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources