Scala tympani cochleostomy I: results of a survey
- PMID: 17921902
- DOI: 10.1097/MLG.0b013e3181453a6c
Scala tympani cochleostomy I: results of a survey
Abstract
Objective: To assess current surgical techniques for scala tympani cochlear implantation among North American surgeons.
Material: A survey was distributed to all cochlear implant surgeons participating in the 2006 William House Cochlear Implant Study Group in Toronto, Canada. Participants were asked to anonymously identify their routine surgical practices. Images of trans-facial recess approaches to the round window and cochlear promontory were used in a multiple-choice fashion to assess the surgeon's typical exposure and cochleostomy location. Returned questionnaires were electronically processed and evaluated.
Results: Fifty-five (75%) of 73 returned surveys had adequate data validity and availability. Landmark identification and preferred cochleostomy locations varied greatly. About 20% of surgeons selected cochleostomy locations superior to the round window membrane. Cochleostomy size and location appeared to be influenced by surgical experience and whether or not the round window overhang was drilled off.
Conclusion: This survey clearly documents marked variations in surgical techniques for scala tympani cochlear implantation. Future studies should more clearly define the surgical anatomy of this region for appropriate placement of a scala tympani cochleostomy. These findings may ultimately have an impact on hearing and neural preservation cochlear implant surgeries.
Similar articles
-
Scala tympani cochleostomy II: topography and histology.Laryngoscope. 2007 Dec;117(12):2195-200. doi: 10.1097/MLG.0b013e3181453a53. Laryngoscope. 2007. PMID: 17909447
-
Scala tympani cochleostomy survey: a follow-up study.Laryngoscope. 2014 Aug;124(8):1928-31. doi: 10.1002/lary.24609. Epub 2014 May 27. Laryngoscope. 2014. PMID: 25098750
-
Anatomy of the middle-turn cochleostomy.Laryngoscope. 2008 Dec;118(12):2200-4. doi: 10.1097/MLG.0b013e318182ee1c. Laryngoscope. 2008. PMID: 18948831
-
Surgical techniques in cochlear implants.Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2012 Feb;45(1):69-80. doi: 10.1016/j.otc.2011.08.017. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2012. PMID: 22115682 Review.
-
Cochlear implantation through the middle fossa: an anatomic study for a novel technique.Acta Otolaryngol. 2013 Sep;133(9):905-9. doi: 10.3109/00016489.2013.795291. Epub 2013 Jun 24. Acta Otolaryngol. 2013. PMID: 23795614 Review.
Cited by
-
Evaluation of round window accessibility to cochlear implant insertion.Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2013 Mar;270(4):1237-42. doi: 10.1007/s00405-012-2106-4. Epub 2012 Jul 18. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2013. PMID: 22806055
-
Prevalence of Vestibular Dysfunction in Children With Neurological Disabilities: A Systematic Review.Front Neurol. 2019 Dec 17;10:1294. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.01294. eCollection 2019. Front Neurol. 2019. PMID: 31920918 Free PMC article.
-
Role of electrode placement as a contributor to variability in cochlear implant outcomes.Otol Neurotol. 2008 Oct;29(7):920-8. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e318184f492. Otol Neurotol. 2008. PMID: 18667935 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical validation of percutaneous cochlear implant surgery: initial report.Laryngoscope. 2008 Jun;118(6):1031-9. doi: 10.1097/MLG.0b013e31816b309e. Laryngoscope. 2008. PMID: 18401279 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of electrode design and surgical approach on scalar location and cochlear implant outcomes.Laryngoscope. 2014 Nov;124 Suppl 6(0 6):S1-7. doi: 10.1002/lary.24728. Epub 2014 May 30. Laryngoscope. 2014. PMID: 24764083 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical