Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2007 Aug;98(4):339-42.

[Endoscopic ultrasound-fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for pancreatic lesions: effectiveness in clinical practice]

[Article in Italian]
Affiliations
  • PMID: 17921947
Review

[Endoscopic ultrasound-fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for pancreatic lesions: effectiveness in clinical practice]

[Article in Italian]
R Rocca et al. Minerva Med. 2007 Aug.

Abstract

Endoscopic ultrasound-fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) was shown to be a highly reliable and a very effective diagnostic technique, both based on data from clinical trials and from large clinical practice studies. EUS-FNA results are reported to be in good-to-very good agreement with the final diagnosis, and the agreement significantly exceeded the chance agreement. The overall sensitivity and specificity of EUS and of EUS-FNA are very good. EUS-FNA is an effective diagnostic technique for the evaluation of pancreatic lesions, either reported with other imaging tests or suspected on the basis of clinical and biochemical features. EUS-FNA may be performed in most cases, and the results of EUS-FNA are particularly important for their excellent positive predictive value. Nonetheless, in a few cases EUS-FNA can not be feasible, or can give false negative or inconclusive

Results: The main practical consequence is that before referring patients to surgeons or oncologists, EUS-FNA should be considered as the best diagnostic strategy, since tissue is still the issue' . In a prospective two-centers consecutive series from Italy, FNA did not give any false positive diagnoses of malignancy, and reduced the number of indeterminate diagnoses; moreover, FNA significantly increased the specificity of diagnosis, while sensitivity was unchanged.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources