Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2007 Dec;16(12):2111-7.
doi: 10.1007/s00586-007-0503-y. Epub 2007 Oct 6.

The reliability of the Vernon and Mior neck disability index, and its validity compared with the short form-36 health survey questionnaire

Affiliations
Comparative Study

The reliability of the Vernon and Mior neck disability index, and its validity compared with the short form-36 health survey questionnaire

M J H McCarthy et al. Eur Spine J. 2007 Dec.

Abstract

Prospective single cohort study. To evaluate the NDI by comparison with the SF36 health Survey Questionnaire. The NDI is a simple ten-item questionnaire used to assess patients with neck pain. The SF36 measures functional ability, well being and the overall health of patients. It is used as a gold standard in health economics to assess the health utility, gain and economic impact of medical interventions. One hundred and sixty patients with neck pain attending the spinal clinic completed self-assessment questionnaires. A second questionnaire was completed in 34 patients after a period of 1-2 weeks. The internal consistency of the NDI and SF36 was calculated using Cronbach's alpha. The test-retest reliability was assessed using the Bland and Altman method. The concurrent validity of the NDI with respect to the SF-36 was assessed using Pearson correlations. Both questionnaires showed robust internal consistency: Cronbach's alpha for the NDI scale was acceptable (0.864, 95% confidence limits 0.825-0.894) though slightly smaller than that of the SF36. The correlations between each item of the NDI scores and the total NDI score ranged from 0.447 to 0.659, (all with P < 0.001). The test-retest reliability of the NDI was high (intra-class correlation 0.93, 95% confidence limits 0.86-0.97) and comparable with the best values found for SF36. The correlations between NDI and SF36 domains ranged from -0.45 to -0.74 (all with P < 0.001). We have shown that the NDI has good reliability and validity and that it compares well with the SF36 in the spinal surgery out patient setting.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Distribution of categorised NDI scores
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
ad Bland and Altman plots illustrating the test retest reproducibility of the NDI, VAS and SF36 (each point represents a patient)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1080/165019702760390383', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1080/165019702760390383'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '12440803', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12440803/'}]}
    2. Ackelman BH, Lindgren U (2002) Validity and reliability of a modified version of the neck disability index. J Rehabil Med 34:284–287 - PubMed
    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'PMC', 'value': 'PMC2352101', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2352101/'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '8819450', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8819450/'}]}
    2. Bland JM, Altman DG (1996) Measurement error. Br Med J 313:744–746 - PMC - PubMed
    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'PMC', 'value': 'PMC2126061', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2126061/'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '9055718', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9055718/'}]}
    2. Bland JM, Altman DG (1997) Statistics notes: Cronbach’s alpha. BMJ 314:572 - PMC - PubMed
    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '8066508', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8066508/'}]}
    2. Bovim G, Schrader H, Sand T (1994) Neck pain in the general population. Spine 19:1307–1309 - PubMed
    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1097/01.brs.0000201241.90914.22', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000201241.90914.22'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '16508559', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16508559/'}]}
    2. Cleland JA, Fritz JM, Whitman JM, Palmer JA (2006) The reliability and construct validity of the neck disability index and patient specific functional scale in patients with cervical radiculopathy. Spine 31:598–602 - PubMed

MeSH terms