A strategy to improve priority setting in developing countries
- PMID: 17922194
- DOI: 10.1007/s10728-006-0037-1
A strategy to improve priority setting in developing countries
Abstract
Because the demand for health services outstrips the available resources, priority setting is one of the most difficult issues faced by health policy makers, particularly those in developing countries. Priority setting in developing countries is fraught with uncertainty due to lack of credible information, weak priority setting institutions, and unclear priority setting processes. Efforts to improve priority setting in these contexts have focused on providing information and tools. In this paper we argue that priority setting is a value laden and political process, and although important, the available information and tools are not sufficient to address the priority setting challenges in developing countries. Additional complementary efforts are required. Hence, a strategy to improve priority setting in developing countries should also include: (i) capturing current priority setting practices, (ii) improving the legitimacy and capacity of institutions that set priorities, and (iii) developing fair priority setting processes.
Similar articles
-
Priority setting in developing countries health care institutions: the case of a Ugandan hospital.BMC Health Serv Res. 2006 Oct 6;6:127. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-6-127. BMC Health Serv Res. 2006. PMID: 17026761 Free PMC article.
-
What do district health planners in Tanzania think about improving priority setting using 'Accountability for reasonableness'?BMC Health Serv Res. 2007 Nov 12;7:180. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-7-180. BMC Health Serv Res. 2007. PMID: 17997824 Free PMC article.
-
Priority setting in the provincial health services authority: survey of key decision makers.BMC Health Serv Res. 2007 Jun 12;7:84. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-7-84. BMC Health Serv Res. 2007. PMID: 17565691 Free PMC article.
-
How effective has the essential health package been in improving priority setting in low income countries?Soc Sci Med. 2013 May;85:38-42. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.02.024. Epub 2013 Feb 24. Soc Sci Med. 2013. PMID: 23540364 Review.
-
How have systematic priority setting approaches influenced policy making? A synthesis of the current literature.Health Policy. 2017 Sep;121(9):937-946. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.07.003. Epub 2017 Jul 12. Health Policy. 2017. PMID: 28734682 Review.
Cited by
-
Challenges to fair decision-making processes in the context of health care services: a qualitative assessment from Tanzania.Int J Equity Health. 2012 Jun 7;11:30. doi: 10.1186/1475-9276-11-30. Int J Equity Health. 2012. PMID: 22676204 Free PMC article.
-
Advancing the WHO-INTEGRATE Framework as a Tool for Evidence-Informed, Deliberative Decision-Making Processes: Exploring the Views of Developers and Users of WHO Guidelines.Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 May 1;11(5):629-641. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2020.193. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022. PMID: 33131223 Free PMC article.
-
Research for better health: the Panamanian priority-setting experience and the need for a new process.Health Res Policy Syst. 2014 Aug 12;12:38. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-12-38. Health Res Policy Syst. 2014. PMID: 25117661 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Setting Healthcare Priorities at the Macro and Meso Levels: A Framework for Evaluation.Int J Health Policy Manag. 2015 Sep 16;4(11):719-32. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2015.167. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2015. PMID: 26673332 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Priority setting in the German healthcare system: results from a discrete choice experiment.Int J Health Econ Manag. 2023 Sep;23(3):411-431. doi: 10.1007/s10754-023-09347-y. Epub 2023 May 15. Int J Health Econ Manag. 2023. PMID: 37184821 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical