Interhemisphere differences during tasks involving attention and selection of lateralized stimuli
- PMID: 17922246
- DOI: 10.1007/s11055-007-0086-4
Interhemisphere differences during tasks involving attention and selection of lateralized stimuli
Abstract
The state of cortical activation in the parietal and temporal areas of the right and left hemispheres was evaluated using evoked potentials (EP) during tasks consisting of selection of visual stimuli lateralized in the right and left visual fields and needing three different types of attention: to stimulus shape, to stimulus position, and simultaneously to stimulus shape and position. EP were recorded in 15 young healthy experimental subjects using six cortical leads: P3, P4, T3, T4, T5, and T6; the following endogenous EP components (in standard terminology) were analyzed: contingent negative variation (CNV), N1, P3, and the N1-P3 complex. Asymmetry in evoked potentials was assessed in terms of differences to contra-and ipsilateral stimuli in the right and left hemispheres. EP asymmetry was detected in the right hemisphere in all types of selection of lateralized stimuli. The magnitude of asymmetry in the right hemisphere depended on the level (or intensity) of attention: the degree of asymmetry increased with increases in the need for attention to analyze the stimuli. There was a significant relationship between the magnitude of asymmetry and the latent periods of the subjects' responses. The functional significance of these data demonstrating asymmetry may be that it provides better spatial differentiation of visual signals in the right hemisphere, along with dominance of the right hemisphere in attention tasks.
Similar articles
-
[Interhemisphere differences of extrastriate cortical activation during attention and selection of lateralized visual stimuli in humans].Ross Fiziol Zh Im I M Sechenova. 2006 Jun;92(6):709-22. Ross Fiziol Zh Im I M Sechenova. 2006. PMID: 16967868 Russian.
-
Characteristics of activation in the parietal areas of the cortex in humans in different types of visual attention.Neurosci Behav Physiol. 2007 May;37(4):331-9. doi: 10.1007/s11055-007-0018-3. Neurosci Behav Physiol. 2007. PMID: 17457527
-
[Characteristics of the parietal cortex activation in humans during different attention tasks].Ross Fiziol Zh Im I M Sechenova. 2006 Feb;92(2):178-90. Ross Fiziol Zh Im I M Sechenova. 2006. PMID: 16739651 Russian.
-
Effects of selective visual attention in the parietal and temporal areas of the human cortex using evoked potential data.Neurosci Behav Physiol. 2005 Feb;35(2):159-64. doi: 10.1007/s11055-005-0060-y. Neurosci Behav Physiol. 2005. PMID: 15779328 Clinical Trial.
-
[Manifestations of selective visual attention in human parietal and temporal cortex according to evoked potentials].Ross Fiziol Zh Im I M Sechenova. 2003 Jul;89(7):776-85. Ross Fiziol Zh Im I M Sechenova. 2003. PMID: 14758613 Russian.
Cited by
-
Auditory P3 in antidepressant pharmacotherapy treatment responders, non-responders and controls.Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2013 Nov;23(11):1561-9. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2013.03.003. Epub 2013 May 9. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2013. PMID: 23664712 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Antipointing: perception-based visual information renders an offline mode of control.Exp Brain Res. 2010 Apr;202(1):55-64. doi: 10.1007/s00221-009-2111-z. Epub 2009 Dec 12. Exp Brain Res. 2010. PMID: 20012599
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources