The utility of a quality improvement bundle in bridging the gap between research and standard care in the management of severe sepsis and septic shock in the emergency department
- PMID: 17923718
- DOI: 10.1197/j.aem.2007.06.024
The utility of a quality improvement bundle in bridging the gap between research and standard care in the management of severe sepsis and septic shock in the emergency department
Abstract
The research in the management of severe sepsis and septic shock has resulted in a number of therapeutic strategies with significant survival benefits. These results also emphasize the primary importance of early hemodynamic resuscitation, or early goal-directed therapy (EGDT), and place the emergency physician in the center of the multidisciplinary team caring for patients with this disease. However, in a busy emergency department, the translation of research into clinical practice is far from ideal. While the benefits are significant, the successful implementation of EGDT is filled with challenges and obstacles. In this article, we will discuss the steps taken at our institution to create, implement, measure, and improve on a six-hour severe sepsis and septic shock treatment bundle incorporating EGDT in the emergency department setting, resulting in significant mortality benefit.
Similar articles
-
Implementation of a bundle of quality indicators for the early management of severe sepsis and septic shock is associated with decreased mortality.Crit Care Med. 2007 Apr;35(4):1105-12. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000259463.33848.3D. Crit Care Med. 2007. PMID: 17334251
-
Early goal-directed therapy, corticosteroid, and recombinant human activated protein C for the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock in the emergency department.Acad Emerg Med. 2006 Jan;13(1):109-13. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.08.005. Epub 2005 Dec 19. Acad Emerg Med. 2006. PMID: 16365336
-
[A study of rate of compliance with sepsis bundle in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock in emergency department].Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2011 Mar;23(3):138-41. Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2011. PMID: 21366940 Chinese.
-
Severe sepsis and septic shock: improving outcomes in the emergency department.Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2008 Aug;26(3):603-23, vii. doi: 10.1016/j.emc.2008.05.004. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2008. PMID: 18655937 Review.
-
Early interventions in severe sepsis and septic shock: a review of the evidence one decade later.Minerva Anestesiol. 2012 Jun;78(6):712-24. Epub 2012 Mar 23. Minerva Anestesiol. 2012. PMID: 22447123 Review.
Cited by
-
The German Quality Network Sepsis: study protocol for the evaluation of a quality collaborative on decreasing sepsis-related mortality in a quasi-experimental difference-in-differences design.Implement Sci. 2018 Jan 18;13(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0706-5. Implement Sci. 2018. PMID: 29347952 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Assessment of implementation methods in sepsis: study protocol for a cluster-randomized hybrid type 2 trial.Trials. 2023 Sep 29;24(1):620. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07644-y. Trials. 2023. PMID: 37773067 Free PMC article.
-
Early goal-directed resuscitation for patients with severe sepsis and septic shock: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2016 Mar 5;24:23. doi: 10.1186/s13049-016-0214-7. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2016. PMID: 26946514 Free PMC article.
-
From evidence to clinical practice in blood and marrow transplantation.Blood Rev. 2015 Nov;29(6):351-7. doi: 10.1016/j.blre.2015.04.001. Epub 2015 Apr 19. Blood Rev. 2015. PMID: 25934009 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Compliance with severe sepsis bundles and its effect on patient outcomes of severe community-acquired pneumonia in a limited resources country.Arch Med Sci. 2014 Oct 27;10(5):970-8. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2014.46216. Epub 2014 Oct 23. Arch Med Sci. 2014. PMID: 25395949 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous