Comparison of whole-body 64-slice multidetector computed tomography and conventional radiography in staging of multiple myeloma
- PMID: 17924119
- DOI: 10.1007/s00330-007-0738-3
Comparison of whole-body 64-slice multidetector computed tomography and conventional radiography in staging of multiple myeloma
Abstract
This study compares the sensitivity of whole-body multidetector CT (MDCT) and conventional radiography (CR) in the staging of multiple myeloma (MM). Twenty-nine patients with MM underwent a staging examination both by MDCT and CR. CT examination was performed with a collimation of 64x0.6 mm, a tube potential of 100 kVp, an effective tube current-time product of 100 mAs and automatic dose modulation as low-dose protocol. Number, size and diagnostic confidence of osteolytic lesions were determined and compared. The effective dose of MDCT and CR was assessed. Using MDCT, the detection of osteolysis was increased seven-fold concerning the spine. Ninety-seven lesions in 18 patients were detected exclusively by MDCT. The detection rate concerning the spine, pelvic skeleton and thoracic cage was significantly higher (p< or =0.001), and diagnostic confidence was increased by MDCT (p<0.02) compared to CR. Therapy was changed after MDCT in 18.2% of the patients with a clinical suspicion of progressive disease. The estimated effective dose of MDCT (4.8 mSv) and CR (1.7 mSv) was comparable. In conclusion, MDCT has a significantly higher sensitivity and reliability in the detection of osteolysis than CR and can be recommended as standard imaging method in the staging of MM.
Similar articles
-
Whole-body low-dose multidetector row-CT in the diagnosis of multiple myeloma: an alternative to conventional radiography.Eur J Radiol. 2005 May;54(2):289-97. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2004.04.015. Eur J Radiol. 2005. PMID: 15837412 Clinical Trial.
-
Role of whole-body 64-slice multidetector computed tomography in treatment planning for multiple myeloma.Radiol Med. 2013 Aug;118(5):799-805. doi: 10.1007/s11547-012-0880-0. Epub 2012 Sep 17. Radiol Med. 2013. PMID: 22986700
-
Multidetector CT of the spine in multiple myeloma: comparison with MR imaging and radiography.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002 Jun;178(6):1429-36. doi: 10.2214/ajr.178.6.1781429. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002. PMID: 12034612
-
Whole-body MRI versus whole-body MDCT for staging of multiple myeloma.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008 Apr;190(4):1097-104. doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.2635. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008. PMID: 18356461
-
MDCT in the evaluation of skeletal trauma: principles, protocols, and clinical applications.Emerg Radiol. 2006 Oct;13(1):7-18. doi: 10.1007/s10140-006-0509-5. Epub 2006 Aug 24. Emerg Radiol. 2006. PMID: 16932939 Review.
Cited by
-
Inter-observer agreement for the evaluation of bone involvement on Whole Body Low Dose Computed Tomography (WBLDCT) in Multiple Myeloma (MM).Eur Radiol. 2015 Nov;25(11):3382-9. doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-3733-0. Epub 2015 May 20. Eur Radiol. 2015. PMID: 25987427
-
Diagnosis, treatment, and response assessment in solitary plasmacytoma: updated recommendations from a European Expert Panel.J Hematol Oncol. 2018 Jan 16;11(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s13045-017-0549-1. J Hematol Oncol. 2018. PMID: 29338789 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Accuracy of whole-body low-dose multidetector CT (WBLDCT) versus skeletal survey in the detection of myelomatous lesions, and correlation of disease distribution with whole-body MRI (WBMRI).Skeletal Radiol. 2009 Mar;38(3):225-36. doi: 10.1007/s00256-008-0607-4. Epub 2008 Nov 14. Skeletal Radiol. 2009. PMID: 19009290 Clinical Trial.
-
New Approaches to Molecular Imaging of Multiple Myeloma.J Nucl Med. 2016 Jan;57(1):1-4. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.115.163808. Epub 2015 Nov 5. J Nucl Med. 2016. PMID: 26541780 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Multiple myeloma: What is the most cost-effective imaging strategy for initial detection of bone lesions?Skeletal Radiol. 2025 May;54(5):1081-1091. doi: 10.1007/s00256-024-04810-4. Epub 2024 Oct 28. Skeletal Radiol. 2025. PMID: 39466393
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical