A systematic genetic assessment of 1,433 sequence variants of unknown clinical significance in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 breast cancer-predisposition genes
- PMID: 17924331
- PMCID: PMC2265654
- DOI: 10.1086/521032
A systematic genetic assessment of 1,433 sequence variants of unknown clinical significance in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 breast cancer-predisposition genes
Abstract
Mutation screening of the breast and ovarian cancer-predisposition genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 is becoming an increasingly important part of clinical practice. Classification of rare nontruncating sequence variants in these genes is problematic, because it is not known whether these subtle changes alter function sufficiently to predispose cells to cancer development. Using data from the Myriad Genetic Laboratories database of nearly 70,000 full-sequence tests, we assessed the clinical significance of 1,433 sequence variants of unknown significance (VUSs) in the BRCA genes. Three independent measures were employed in the assessment: co-occurrence in trans of a VUS with known deleterious mutations; detailed analysis, by logistic regression, of personal and family history of cancer in VUS-carrying probands; and, in a subset of probands, an analysis of cosegregation with disease in pedigrees. For each of these factors, a likelihood ratio was computed under the hypothesis that the VUSs were equivalent to an "average" deleterious mutation, compared with neutral, with respect to risk. The likelihood ratios derived from each component were combined to provide an overall assessment for each VUS. A total of 133 VUSs had odds of at least 100 : 1 in favor of neutrality with respect to risk, whereas 43 had odds of at least 20 : 1 in favor of being deleterious. VUSs with evidence in favor of causality were those that were predicted to affect splicing, fell at positions that are highly conserved among BRCA orthologs, and were more likely to be located in specific domains of the proteins. In addition to their utility for improved genetics counseling of patients and their families, the global assessment reported here will be invaluable for validation of functional assays, structural models, and in silico analyses.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Frequency of mutations in BRCA genes and other candidate genes in high-risk probands or probands with breast or ovarian cancer in the Czech Republic.Mol Biol Rep. 2020 Apr;47(4):2763-2769. doi: 10.1007/s11033-020-05378-7. Epub 2020 Mar 16. Mol Biol Rep. 2020. PMID: 32180084
-
Reclassification of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants of uncertain significance: a multifactorial analysis of multicentre prospective cohort.J Med Genet. 2018 Dec;55(12):794-802. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2018-105565. Epub 2018 Nov 10. J Med Genet. 2018. PMID: 30415210
-
Reinterpretation of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants of uncertain significance in patients with hereditary breast/ovarian cancer using the ACMG/AMP 2015 guidelines.Breast Cancer. 2019 Jul;26(4):510-519. doi: 10.1007/s12282-019-00951-w. Epub 2019 Feb 6. Breast Cancer. 2019. PMID: 30725392
-
BRCA1/2 variants of unknown significance in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) syndrome: Looking for the hidden meaning.Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2022 Apr;172:103626. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2022.103626. Epub 2022 Feb 10. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2022. PMID: 35150867 Review.
-
Twenty Years of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Molecular Analysis at MMCI - Current Developments for the Classification of Variants.Klin Onkol. 2019 Summer;32(Supplementum2):51-71. doi: 10.14735/amko2019S51. Klin Onkol. 2019. PMID: 31409081 Review. English.
Cited by
-
Assessment of small in-frame indels and C-terminal nonsense variants of BRCA1 using a validated functional assay.Sci Rep. 2022 Sep 28;12(1):16203. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-20500-4. Sci Rep. 2022. PMID: 36171434 Free PMC article.
-
Functional evaluation of BRCA2 variants mapping to the PALB2-binding and C-terminal DNA-binding domains using a mouse ES cell-based assay.Hum Mol Genet. 2012 Sep 15;21(18):3993-4006. doi: 10.1093/hmg/dds222. Epub 2012 Jun 7. Hum Mol Genet. 2012. PMID: 22678057 Free PMC article.
-
In Silico and Structure-Based Assessment of Similar Variants Discovered in Tandem Repeats of BRCT Domains of BRCA1 and BARD1 To Characterize the Folding Pattern.ACS Omega. 2022 Nov 28;7(49):44772-44785. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.2c04782. eCollection 2022 Dec 13. ACS Omega. 2022. PMID: 36530327 Free PMC article.
-
BRCA Challenge: BRCA Exchange as a global resource for variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2.PLoS Genet. 2018 Dec 26;14(12):e1007752. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007752. eCollection 2018 Dec. PLoS Genet. 2018. PMID: 30586411 Free PMC article.
-
Rosetta Energy Analysis of AlphaFold2 models: Point Mutations and Conformational Ensembles.bioRxiv [Preprint]. 2024 Jan 27:2023.09.05.556364. doi: 10.1101/2023.09.05.556364. bioRxiv. 2024. PMID: 37732281 Free PMC article. Preprint.
References
Web Resources
-
- Align GVGD, http://agvgd.iarc.fr/
-
- Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM), http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Omim/ (for BRCA1 and BRCA2)
References
-
- Burke W, Daly M, Garber J, Botkin J, Kahn MJ, Lynch P, McTiernan A, Offit K, Perlman J, Petersen G, et al (1997) Recommendations for follow-up care of individuals with an inherited predisposition to cancer: II. BRCA1 and BRCA2—Cancer Genetics Studies Consortium. JAMA 277:997–100310.1001/jama.277.12.997 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Lucci-Cordisco E, Boccuto L, Neri G, Genuardi M (2006) The use of microsatellite instability, immunohistochemistry and other variables in determining the clinical significance of MLH1 and MSH2 unclassified variants in Lynch syndrome. Cancer Biomark 2:11–27 - PubMed
-
- Billack B, Monteiro AN (2004) Methods to classify BRCA1 variants of uncertain clinical significance: the more the merrier. Cancer Biol Ther 3:458–459 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Molecular Biology Databases
Miscellaneous