Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Jun;21(5):489-97.
doi: 10.1002/nbm.1216.

Amide proton transfer imaging of 9L gliosarcoma and human glioblastoma xenografts

Affiliations

Amide proton transfer imaging of 9L gliosarcoma and human glioblastoma xenografts

Amandeep Salhotra et al. NMR Biomed. 2008 Jun.

Abstract

Amide proton transfer (APT) imaging is a variant of magnetization transfer (MT) imaging, in which the contrast is determined by a change in water intensity due to chemical exchange with saturated amide protons of endogenous mobile proteins and peptides. In this study, eight Fisher 344 rats implanted with 9L gliosarcoma cells and six nude rats implanted with human glioblastoma cells were imaged at 4.7 T. There were increased signal intensities in tumors in the APT-weighted images. The contrast of APT imaging between the tumor and contralateral brain tissue was about 3.9% in water intensity (1.49 +/- 0.66% vs -2.36 +/- 0.19%) for the more uniformly hypercellular 9L brain tumors, and it was reduced to 1.6% (-1.18 +/- 0.60% vs -2.77 +/- 0.42%) for the human glioblastoma xenografts that contained hypocellular zones of necrosis. The preliminary results show that the APT technique at the protein level may provide a unique MRI contrast for the characterization of brain tumors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Z-spectra (A, B), MTRasym spectra (C, D), and MTRasym-difference spectra (E, F) for the 9L brain tumors (left column, 12 days post-implantation, n = 6) and the human glioblastoma brain tumors (right column, 7 weeks post-implantation, n = 2). The data from the same post-implantation days were averaged. The offsets of ±6 ppm were excluded in the display. Tumor: open circles; contralateral normal brain tissue: solid circles. MTRasym difference = MTRasym(tumor) − MTRasym(normal). The APT effects are visible at the offset of 3.5 ppm in the z-spectra and MTRasym spectra. The effect is stronger in tumor than in the contralateral normal-appearing region.
Figure 2
Figure 2
MR images and histology for the 9L gliosarcoma tumor model in a Fisher 344 rat (12 days post-implantation). The tumor is visible in all of the MR images, as confirmed by histology. The APT-weighted image appears to distinguish a small, likely edematous region (arrow) from tumor. The blue dotted line on the APT-weighted image defined a tumor ROI for quantitative analysis.
Figure 3
Figure 3
MR images and histology for the human glioblastoma brain tumor model in a nude rat (7 weeks post-implantation). The hyperintense (T2, T1, ADC) or hypointense (MTR) regions on several conventional MR images are larger than that on the APT-weighted image. The APT-weighted image is able to separate the likely edematous part (arrow) from tumor, and its hyperintensity profile is in good correspondence with histology. The blue dotted line on the APT-weighted image defined a tumor ROI for quantitative analysis.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Photomicrographs of hematoxylin and eosin stained sections of orthotopic human glioblastoma (A, C) and 9L gliosarcoma (B, D). Prominent hypocellular, eosinophilic zones of necrosis (N) are evident within the deeper regions of the human glioblastoma tumors and absent within the 9L gliosarcoma model. White arrows (C) indicate pseudopalisades that surround the necrosis. Bars equal 1 mm (A, B) and 0.5 mm (C, D).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Wolff SD, Balaban RS. Magnetization transfer contrast (MTC) and tissue water proton relaxation in vivo. Magn. Reson. Med. 1989;10:135–144. - PubMed
    1. Balaban RS, Ceckler TL. Magnetization transfer contrast in magnetic resonance imaging. Magn. Reson. Q. 1992;8:116–137. - PubMed
    1. Bryant RG. The dynamics of water-protein interactions. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 1996;25:29–53. - PubMed
    1. Henkelman RM, Stanisz GJ, Graham SJ. Magnetization transfer in MRI: a review. NMR Biomed. 2001;14:57–64. - PubMed
    1. Yousem DM, Montone KT, Sheppard LM, Rao VM, Weinstein GS, Hayden RE. Head and neck neoplasms - magnetization-transfer analysis. Radiology. 1994;192:703–707. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources