Target selection during bimanual reaching to direct cues is unaffected by the perceptual similarity of the targets
- PMID: 17924810
- DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.33.5.1107
Target selection during bimanual reaching to direct cues is unaffected by the perceptual similarity of the targets
Abstract
Investigations of bimanual movements have shed considerable insight on the constraints underlying our ability to perform coordinated actions. One prominent limitation is evident when people are required to produce reaching movements in which the two trajectories are of different amplitudes and/or directions. This effect, however, is only obtained when the movements are cued symbolically (e.g., letters indicate target locations); these planning costs are absent when the target locations are directly cued (J. Diedrichsen, E. Hazeltine, S. Kennerley, & R. B. Ivry, 2001). The present experiments test whether the absence of planning costs under the latter condition is due to the perceptual similarity of the direct cues. The results demonstrate that measures of response planning and execution do not depend on the perceptual similarity of the direct cues. Limitations in our ability to perform distinct actions with the two hands appear to reflect interactions related to response selection involving the translation of symbolic cues into their associated movements rather than arise from interactions associated with perception, motor programming, and motor execution.
(c) 2007 APA
Similar articles
-
Bimanual cross-talk during reaching movements is primarily related to response selection, not the specification of motor parameters.Psychol Res. 2003 Feb;67(1):56-70. doi: 10.1007/s00426-002-0119-0. Epub 2002 Nov 26. Psychol Res. 2003. PMID: 12589450 Clinical Trial.
-
Goal-selection and movement-related conflict during bimanual reaching movements.Cereb Cortex. 2006 Dec;16(12):1729-38. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhj108. Epub 2006 Jan 4. Cereb Cortex. 2006. PMID: 16400162
-
Bimanual interference in rapid discrete movements is task specific and occurs at multiple levels of processing.J Neurophysiol. 2005 Sep;94(3):1861-8. doi: 10.1152/jn.00320.2005. Epub 2005 May 25. J Neurophysiol. 2005. PMID: 15917318
-
Conceptual binding: integrated visual cues reduce processing costs in bimanual movements.J Neurophysiol. 2009 Jul;102(1):302-11. doi: 10.1152/jn.91090.2008. Epub 2009 Apr 15. J Neurophysiol. 2009. PMID: 19369359
-
Hidden cognitive states revealed in choice reaching tasks.Trends Cogn Sci. 2009 Aug;13(8):360-6. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2009.04.009. Epub 2009 Jul 31. Trends Cogn Sci. 2009. PMID: 19647475 Review.
Cited by
-
The impact of perceptual, cognitive and motor factors on bimanual coordination.Psychol Res. 2013 Nov;77(6):794-807. doi: 10.1007/s00426-012-0468-2. Epub 2012 Dec 4. Psychol Res. 2013. PMID: 23207692
-
Individual differences in processing resources modulate bimanual interference in pointing.Psychol Res. 2020 Mar;84(2):440-453. doi: 10.1007/s00426-018-1050-3. Epub 2018 Jul 17. Psychol Res. 2020. PMID: 30019268 Free PMC article.
-
Co-actors represent the order of each other's actions.Cognition. 2018 Dec;181:65-79. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.08.008. Epub 2018 Aug 22. Cognition. 2018. PMID: 30142512 Free PMC article.
-
Comparing movement preparation of unimanual, bimanual symmetric, and bimanual asymmetric movements.Exp Brain Res. 2014 Mar;232(3):947-55. doi: 10.1007/s00221-013-3807-7. Epub 2014 Jan 1. Exp Brain Res. 2014. PMID: 24381087
-
Goal congruency without stimulus congruency in bimanual coordination.Psychol Res. 2009 Jan;73(1):34-42. doi: 10.1007/s00426-008-0140-z. Epub 2008 Mar 5. Psychol Res. 2009. PMID: 18320217
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources