A comparison of dexmedetomidine and midazolam for sedation in third molar surgery
- PMID: 17924894
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2007.05230.x
A comparison of dexmedetomidine and midazolam for sedation in third molar surgery
Abstract
This randomised, double-blind study compared dexmedetomidine and midazolam for intravenous sedation during third molar surgery under local anaesthesia. Sixty patients received either dexmedetomidine (up to 1 microg x kg(-1)) or midazolam (up to 5 mg), which was infused until the Ramsay Sedation Score was four or the maximum dose limit was reached. Intra-operative vital signs, postoperative pain scores and analgesic consumption, amnesia, and satisfaction scores for patients and surgeons, were recorded. Sedation was achieved by median (IQR (range)) doses of 47 microg (39-52 (25-76)) or 0.88 microg x kg(-1) (0.75-1.0 (0.6-1.0)) dexmedetomidine, and 3.6 mg (3.3-4.4 (1.9-5.0)) or 0.07 mg x kg(-1) (0.055-0.085 (0.017-0.12)) midazolam. Heart rate and blood pressure during surgery were lower in dexmedetomidine group. There was no significant difference in satisfaction or pain scores. Midazolam was associated with greater amnesia. Dexmedetomidine produces comparable sedation to midazolam.
Similar articles
-
Dexmedetomidine versus midazolam in outpatient third molar surgery.J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006 Sep;64(9):1353-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2006.05.020. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006. PMID: 16916668 Clinical Trial.
-
A comparison of midazolam and midazolam with remifentanil for patient-controlled sedation during operations on third molars.Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007 Apr;45(3):212-6. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2006.06.002. Epub 2006 Aug 23. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007. PMID: 16930785 Clinical Trial.
-
A comparison of dexmedetomidine versus midazolam for sedation, pain and hemodynamic control, during colonoscopy under conscious sedation.Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2010 Jul;27(7):648-52. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e3283347bfe. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2010. PMID: 20531094 Clinical Trial.
-
Anaesthesia or sedation for MRI in children.Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2010 Aug;23(4):513-7. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e32833bb524. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2010. PMID: 20531170 Review.
-
Comparison of dexmedetomidine with midazolam for third molar surgery: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Jun 23;102(25):e33155. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000033155. Medicine (Baltimore). 2023. PMID: 37352026 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Comparison of safety of general anesthesia and intravenous sedation during third-molar extraction surgery.Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 19;14(1):16687. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-67045-2. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 39030390 Free PMC article.
-
Recovery time after oral and maxillofacial ambulatory surgery with dexmedetomidine: an observational study.Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Jan;23(1):391-397. doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2447-5. Epub 2018 Apr 20. Clin Oral Investig. 2019. PMID: 29679228
-
The effect of mindfulness meditation on dental anxiety during implant surgery: a randomized controlled clinical trial.Sci Rep. 2023 Dec 7;13(1):21686. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-49092-3. Sci Rep. 2023. PMID: 38066232 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Dexmedetomidine, ketamine, and midazolam for oral rehabilitation: a case report.Anesth Prog. 2015 Spring;62(1):25-30. doi: 10.2344/0003-3006-62.1.25. Anesth Prog. 2015. PMID: 25849472 Free PMC article.
-
A prospective randomized double-blind study comparing dexmedetomidine vs. combination of midazolam-fentanyl for tympanoplasty surgery under monitored anesthesia care.J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2013 Apr;29(2):173-8. doi: 10.4103/0970-9185.111671. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2013. PMID: 23878436 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical