Fear, human shields and the redistribution of prey and predators in protected areas
- PMID: 17925272
- PMCID: PMC2391231
- DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2007.0415
Fear, human shields and the redistribution of prey and predators in protected areas
Abstract
Protected areas form crucial baselines to judge ecological change, yet areas of Africa, Asia and North America that retain large carnivores are under intense economic and political pressures to accommodate massive human visitation and attendant infrastructure. An unintended consequence is the strong modulation of the three-way interaction involving people, predators and prey, a dynamic that questions the extent to which animal distributions and interactions are independent of subtle human influences. Here, I capitalize on the remarkable 9-day synchronicity in which 90% of moose neonates in the Yellowstone Ecosystem are born, to demonstrate a substantive change in how prey avoid predators; birth sites shift away from traffic-averse brown bears and towards paved roads. The decade-long modification was associated with carnivore recolonization, but neither mothers in bear-free areas nor non-parous females altered patterns of landscape use. These findings offer rigorous support that mammals use humans to shield against carnivores and raise the possibility that redistribution has occurred in other mammalian taxa due to human presence in ways we have yet to anticipate. To interpret ecologically functioning systems within parks, we must now also account for indirect anthropogenic effects on species distributions and behaviour.
Figures
References
-
- Albert D.M, Bowyer R.T. Factors related to grizzly bear–human interactions in Denali national park. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 1991;19:339–349.
-
- Armitage K.B. Badger predation on yellow-bellied marmots. Am. Midl. Nat. 2004;151:378–387. doi:10.1674/0003-0031(2004)151[0378:BPOYM]2.0.CO;2 - DOI
-
- Beckman J.P, Berger J. Rapid ecological and behavioural changes in carnivores: the responses of black bears (Ursus americanus) to altered food. J. Zool. 2003;261:207–212. doi:10.1017/S0952836903004126 - DOI
-
- Berger J, Testa J.W, Roffe T, Montfort S.L. Conservation endocrinology: a noninvasive tool to understand relationships between carnivore colonization and ecological carrying capacity. Conserv. Biol. 1999;13:980–989. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1999.98521.x - DOI
-
- Berger J, Swenson J.E, Persson I.-L. Re-colonizing carnivores and naive prey; conservation lessons from Pleistocene extinctions. Science. 2001;291:1036–1039. doi:10.1126/science.1056466 - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
