Sphygmomanometer calibration--why, how and how often?
- PMID: 17925905
Sphygmomanometer calibration--why, how and how often?
Abstract
Background: Hypertension is the most commonly managed problem in general practice. Systematic errors in blood pressure measurements caused by inadequate sphygmomanometer calibration are a common cause of over- and underidentification of hypertension.
Objective: This article reviews sphygmomanometer error and makes recommendations regarding in service maintenance and calibration of sphygmomanometers.
Discussion: Most sphygmomanometer surveys report high rates of inadequate calibration and other faults, particularly in aneroid sphygmomanometers. Automatic electronic sphygmomanometers produce systematic errors in some patients. All sphygmomanometers should be checked and calibrated by an accredited laboratory at least annually. Aneroid sphygmomanometers should be calibrated every 6 months. Only properly validated automatic sphygmomanometers should be used. Practices should perform regular in house checks of sphygmomanometers. Good sphygmomanometer maintenance and traceable sphygmomanometer calibration will contribute to reducing the burden of cardiovascular disease and the number of patients overtreated for hypertension in Australia.
Similar articles
-
Lack of sphygmomanometer calibration causes over- and under-detection of hypertension: a computer simulation study.J Hypertens. 2006 Oct;24(10):1931-8. doi: 10.1097/01.hjh.0000244940.11675.82. J Hypertens. 2006. PMID: 16957551
-
The extent and implications of sphygmomanometer calibration error in primary care.J Hum Hypertens. 2001 Sep;15(9):587-91. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1001241. J Hum Hypertens. 2001. PMID: 11550103
-
Sphygmomanometers--an audit in general practice.Aust Fam Physician. 2004 Nov;33(11):952-4. Aust Fam Physician. 2004. PMID: 15584340
-
Alternatives to the mercury sphygmomanometer.J Public Health Policy. 2011 Feb;32(1):107-20. doi: 10.1057/jphp.2010.38. Epub 2010 Nov 25. J Public Health Policy. 2011. PMID: 21109765 Review.
-
Can we trust automatic sphygmomanometer validations?J Hypertens. 2010 Dec;28(12):2353-6. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e32833e1011. J Hypertens. 2010. PMID: 20706130 Review.
Cited by
-
Analysis of serum fatty acid, amino acid, and organic acid profiles in gestational hypertension and gestational diabetes mellitus via targeted metabolomics.Front Nutr. 2022 Aug 26;9:974902. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.974902. eCollection 2022. Front Nutr. 2022. PMID: 36091252 Free PMC article.
-
Noninvasive techniques for blood pressure measurement are not a reliable alternative to direct measurement: a randomized crossover trial in ICU.ScientificWorldJournal. 2014 Jan 30;2014:353628. doi: 10.1155/2014/353628. eCollection 2014. ScientificWorldJournal. 2014. PMID: 24616624 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
A Survey on Blood Pressure Measurement Technologies: Addressing Potential Sources of Bias.Sensors (Basel). 2024 Mar 7;24(6):1730. doi: 10.3390/s24061730. Sensors (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38543993 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Measurement of Blood Pressure in Humans: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Hypertension. 2019 May;73(5):e35-e66. doi: 10.1161/HYP.0000000000000087. Hypertension. 2019. PMID: 30827125 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Deep learning-based robust automatic non-invasive measurement of blood pressure using Korotkoff sounds.Sci Rep. 2021 Dec 3;11(1):23365. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-02513-7. Sci Rep. 2021. PMID: 34862399 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical