Impact of contact and droplet precautions on the incidence of hospital-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection
- PMID: 17926277
- DOI: 10.1086/521658
Impact of contact and droplet precautions on the incidence of hospital-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of contact and droplet precautions in reducing the incidence of hospital-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections.
Design: Before-after study.Setting. A 439-bed, university-affiliated community hospital.
Methods: To identify inpatients infected or colonized with MRSA, we conducted surveillance of S. aureus isolates recovered from clinical culture and processed by the hospital's clinical microbiology laboratory. We then reviewed patient records for all individuals from whom MRSA was recovered. The rates of hospital-acquired MRSA infection were tabulated for each area where patients received nursing care. After a baseline period, contact and droplet precautions were implemented in all intensive care units (ICUs). Reductions in the incidence of hospital-acquired MRSA infection in ICUs led to the implementation of contact precautions in non-ICU patient care areas (hereafter, "non-ICU areas"), as well. Droplet precautions were discontinued. An analysis comparing the rates of hospital-acquired MRSA infection during different intervention periods was performed.
Results: The combined baseline rate of hospital-acquired MRSA infection was 10.0 infections per 1,000 patient-days in the medical ICU (MICU) and surgical ICU (SICU) and 0.7 infections per 1,000 patient-days in other ICUs. Following the implementation of contact and droplet precautions, combined rates of hospital-acquired MRSA infection in the MICU and SICU decreased to 4.3 infections per 1,000 patient-days (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.17-0.97; P=.03). There was no significant change in hospital-acquired MRSA infection rates in other ICUs. After the discontinuation of droplet precautions, the combined rate in the MICU and SICU decreased further to 2.5 infections per 1,000 patient-days. This finding was not significant (P=.43). In the non-ICU areas that had a high incidence of hospital-acquired MRSA infection, the rate prior to implementation of contact precautions was 1.3 infections per 1,000 patient-days. After the implementation of contact precautions, the rate in these areas decreased to 0.9 infections per 1,000 patient-days (95% CI, 0.47-0.94; P=.02).
Conclusion: The implementation of contact precautions significantly decreased the rate of hospital-acquired MRSA infection, and discontinuation of droplet precautions in the ICUs led to a further reduction. Additional studies evaluating specific infection control strategies are needed.
Similar articles
-
Impact of routine intensive care unit surveillance cultures and resultant barrier precautions on hospital-wide methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia.Clin Infect Dis. 2006 Oct 15;43(8):971-8. doi: 10.1086/507636. Epub 2006 Sep 14. Clin Infect Dis. 2006. PMID: 16983607
-
Implementation of an industrial systems-engineering approach to reduce the incidence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2008 Aug;29(8):702-8, 7 p following 708. doi: 10.1086/589981. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2008. PMID: 18624651
-
Effectiveness of preemptive barrier precautions in controlling nosocomial colonization and infection by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a burn unit.Am J Infect Control. 2006 Oct;34(8):476-83. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2006.01.011. Am J Infect Control. 2006. PMID: 17015152
-
Has decolonization played a central role in the decline in UK methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus transmission? A focus on evidence from intensive care.J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011 Apr;66 Suppl 2:ii41-7. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkq325. Epub 2010 Sep 18. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011. PMID: 20852273 Review.
-
Effect of contact precautions on preventing meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus transmission in intensive care units: a review and modelling study of field trials.J Hosp Infect. 2024 Feb;144:66-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2023.09.023. Epub 2023 Nov 28. J Hosp Infect. 2024. PMID: 38036001 Review.
Cited by
-
One Health in hospitals: how understanding the dynamics of people, animals, and the hospital built-environment can be used to better inform interventions for antimicrobial-resistant gram-positive infections.Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2020 Jun 1;9(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s13756-020-00737-2. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2020. PMID: 32487220 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Hospital infection control strategies for vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Clostridium difficile.CMAJ. 2009 Mar 17;180(6):627-31. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.080195. CMAJ. 2009. PMID: 19289807 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
-
Contact precautions for multidrug-resistant organisms: Current recommendations and actual practice.Am J Infect Control. 2010 Mar;38(2):105-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2009.08.008. Epub 2009 Nov 12. Am J Infect Control. 2010. PMID: 19913329 Free PMC article.
-
[Epidemiology of and preventive measures for multiresistant pathogens].Ophthalmologe. 2010 Apr;107(4):313-7. doi: 10.1007/s00347-009-2074-2. Ophthalmologe. 2010. PMID: 20306054 German.
-
The Impact of COVID-19 Outbreak on Nosocomial Infection Rate: A Case of Iran.Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 2021 Feb 25;2021:6650920. doi: 10.1155/2021/6650920. eCollection 2021. Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 2021. PMID: 33680220 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical