Spectral and temporal cues for phoneme recognition in noise
- PMID: 17927435
- DOI: 10.1121/1.2767000
Spectral and temporal cues for phoneme recognition in noise
Abstract
Cochlear implant users receive limited spectral and temporal information. Their speech recognition deteriorates dramatically in noise. The aim of the present study was to determine the relative contributions of spectral and temporal cues to speech recognition in noise. Spectral information was manipulated by varying the number of channels from 2 to 32 in a noise-excited vocoder. Temporal information was manipulated by varying the low-pass cutoff frequency of the envelope extractor from 1 to 512 Hz. Ten normal-hearing, native speakers of English participated in tests of phoneme recognition using vocoder processed consonants and vowels under three conditions (quiet, and +6 and 0 dB signal-to-noise ratios). The number of channels required for vowel-recognition performance to plateau increased from 12 in quiet to 16-24 in the two noise conditions. However, for consonant recognition, no further improvement in performance was evident when the number of channels was > or =12 in any of the three conditions. The contribution of temporal cues for phoneme recognition showed a similar pattern in both quiet and noise conditions. Similar to the quiet conditions, there was a trade-off between temporal and spectral cues for phoneme recognition in noise.
Similar articles
-
Spectral and temporal cues in cochlear implant speech perception.Ear Hear. 2006 Apr;27(2):208-17. doi: 10.1097/01.aud.0000202312.31837.25. Ear Hear. 2006. PMID: 16518146
-
Speech identification in noise: Contribution of temporal, spectral, and visual speech cues.J Acoust Soc Am. 2009 Dec;126(6):3246-57. doi: 10.1121/1.3250425. J Acoust Soc Am. 2009. PMID: 20000938
-
Effects of vowel context on the recognition of initial and medial consonants by cochlear implant users.Ear Hear. 2006 Dec;27(6):658-77. doi: 10.1097/01.aud.0000240543.31567.54. Ear Hear. 2006. PMID: 17086077
-
ASR for emotional speech: clarifying the issues and enhancing performance.Neural Netw. 2005 May;18(4):437-44. doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2005.03.008. Neural Netw. 2005. PMID: 15946824 Review.
-
Adapted cuing technique: facilitating sequential phoneme production.Clin Commun Disord. 1994 Sep;4(3):183-9. Clin Commun Disord. 1994. PMID: 7994293 Review.
Cited by
-
Effects of source-to-listener distance and masking on perception of cochlear implant processed speech in reverberant rooms.J Acoust Soc Am. 2009 Nov;126(5):2556-69. doi: 10.1121/1.3216912. J Acoust Soc Am. 2009. PMID: 19894835 Free PMC article.
-
Acoustic Change Responses to Amplitude Modulation in Cochlear Implant Users: Relationships to Speech Perception.Front Neurosci. 2020 Feb 18;14:124. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2020.00124. eCollection 2020. Front Neurosci. 2020. PMID: 32132897 Free PMC article.
-
Auditory cortex phase locking to amplitude-modulated cochlear implant pulse trains.J Neurophysiol. 2008 Jul;100(1):76-91. doi: 10.1152/jn.01109.2007. Epub 2008 Mar 26. J Neurophysiol. 2008. PMID: 18367697 Free PMC article.
-
Age-Related Differences in the Processing of Temporal Envelope and Spectral Cues in a Speech Segment.Ear Hear. 2017 Nov/Dec;38(6):e335-e342. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000447. Ear Hear. 2017. PMID: 28562426 Free PMC article.
-
Predicting the intelligibility of vocoded speech.Ear Hear. 2011 May-Jun;32(3):331-8. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181ff3515. Ear Hear. 2011. PMID: 21206363 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous