Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2007 Oct;23(12):971-5.
doi: 10.1016/s0828-282x(07)70859-0.

Time for chronic disease care and management

Affiliations
Review

Time for chronic disease care and management

Terrence J Montague et al. Can J Cardiol. 2007 Oct.

Abstract

To manage the future costs and quality of care, a health strategy must move beyond the individual, acute care model and address the care of older people with chronic, and often multiple, diseases. This strategy must address the issue of care gaps, ie, the differences between best care and usual care. It should also embrace broad partnerships in which providers may be a cross-disciplinary team of nurses, physicians and pharmacists; the patient partners may include all patients in the community with a disease or group of diseases; and the system managers should work with all to seek improved long-term care and share the governance of interventions and resources. This partnership is activated by repeated and widely communicated measurements of actual practices and outcomes, facilitating rapid knowledge gain and translation, including unmasking the invisible wait list of unmeasured care gaps. It drives continuous improvement in practices and outcomes. The time is right for such care models. There is increasing evidence of their clinical and financial benefits. There is a clear and immediate opportunity to evaluate them as part of a health strategy for effective chronic care in our aging society. Things can be better.

La gestion cohérente des coûts et de la qualité des soins exige une nouvelle stratégie qui aille au-delà du modèle de soins aigus individuels et tienne compte des soins efficaces aux patients plus âgés qui souffrent de problèmes de santé chroniques, souvent multiples. Cette stratégie doit répondre aux écarts thérapeutiques, à savoir les différences entre les soins optimaux et les soins couramment dispensés. La nouvelle stratégie doit aussi inclure un partenariat de soins élargi, au sein duquel les prestataires pourraient former une équipe interdisciplinaire composée d’infirmières, de médecins et de pharmaciens, et où les partenaires patients pourraient être l’ensemble des patients de la communauté présentant une même maladie, ou un groupe de maladies, ainsi que leur famille, et des gestionnaires de système; tous visant l’amélioration à long terme des soins et des résultats et partageant la mise en œuvre et la gouvernance des interventions et des ressources. Le partenariat est activé par des mesures répétées et largement diffusées des pratiques et des résultats concrets, facilitant ainsi une acquisition et une application rapides des connaissances, y compris la mise au grand jour de la liste d’attente invisible des écarts thérapeutiques. Cette formule stimule chez les prestataires de soins une amélioration continue des pratiques et des résultats cliniques des patients. Le moment est bien choisi pour de tels modèles de soins. Un nombre croissant de données montre leurs bienfaits cliniques et financiers. Il existe une opportunité évidente et immédiate d’évaluer ces modèles dans le cadre d’une stratégie de soins chroniques et efficaces dans notre société vieillissante. L’amélioration est possible.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1)
Figure 1)
The continuum of medical therapy, from basic science discovery, to proof of efficacy in randomized clinical trials, to use in the real world. Care gaps occur when best care, as defined in efficacy trials, is not rapidly and widely applied to whole populations of patients. The primary consequence of care gaps is a missed opportunity; patients who can benefit from efficacious therapies do not. Reproduced with permission from reference 1
Figure 2)
Figure 2)
The chronic care model of disease management. The community, provider and system partners act together to achieve overarching goals. The arrows represent activating and sustaining communication, including measurement and communication of practices, outcomes and other relevant knowledge, to all partners
Figure 3)
Figure 3)
Temporal changes in prescription patterns of proven efficacious medical therapies for all patients with acute heart attacks admitted to hospital in Nova Scotia from 1997 to 2002 (by second and fourth quarters [2Q and 4Q, respectively]), during the Improving Cardiovascular Outcomes in Nova Scotia (ICONS) disease management project. The principal intervention was the measurement and feedback of care practices to all partners. ACEi Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors; AP Antiplatelets; ARB Angiotensin receptor blockers; BB Beta-blockers. Reproduced with permission from reference 10
Figure 4)
Figure 4)
Comparison of traditional academic, or Mode 1, knowledge production with the less rigid Mode 2 knowledge creation and production typical of community and needs-based disease management partnerships. Partnership-measurement disease management projects provide a practical bridge in which the two knowledge production modes complement each other

References

    1. Montague T. The care gap and its causes In: Montague T Patients First Closing the Health Care Gap in Canada. Mississauga: John Wiley & Sons Canada Ltd; 2004. pp. 35–42.
    1. Taylor LK.Contemporary physician practice patterns: Insights from institutional theory. PhD thesis, University of Alberta, 2002
    1. Smith ER. Cardiovascular health human resources. Can J Cardiol. 2006;22:897–8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lewis R, Dixon J. Rethinking management of chronic diseases. BMJ. 2004;328:220–2. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Montague T. Patient-provider partnerships in healthcare: Enhancing knowledge translation and improving outcomes. Healthc Pap. 2006;7:53–61. - PubMed

MeSH terms