Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Jun;30(3):216-21.
doi: 10.1007/s11096-007-9170-7. Epub 2007 Oct 12.

Critical appraisal of apparently evidence-based written advertising in Pakistan

Affiliations

Critical appraisal of apparently evidence-based written advertising in Pakistan

Dileep Kumar Rohra et al. Pharm World Sci. 2008 Jun.

Abstract

Objectives: The objective of the study was to critically assess references cited in support of claims in drug advertisements.

Methods: Drug advertising brochures were collected from privately practicing General Practitioners from different parts of Karachi. Three blinded reviewers then categorized each reference in the brochure according to the sources viz: journals (both Medline indexed and non-indexed), medical reference books, web addresses, personal communications or testimonials, abstracts presented at symposia/conferences, WHO and National Health Guidelines, 'data on file' and 'others' (which included a diverse set of references). Each reviewer then assessed and analyzed the references further into 2 broad categories: traceable and non-traceable. Traceable references were appraised and, depending upon the claim with which the reference was attached, were classified into justifiable, inaccurate/false, exaggerated and ambiguous.

Results: We collected a total of 175 different brochures. Thirty-nine (22.3%) brochures did not cite any references and were not subjected to further analysis. The remaining 136 (77.7%) contained a total of 559 references. 305 (54.6%) of these references were from Medline-indexed journals; 67 (12.0%) were from non-indexed journals; 55 (9.8%) references quoted medical reference books; 27 (4.8%) references cited web addresses; 12 (2.1%) references were personal communications/testimonials; 11 (2.0%) references referred to abstracts presented at symposia/conferences; 12 (2.1%) references were from WHO and National Health Guidelines; 8 (1.4%) references were listed as 'data on file', while the remainder that could not be defined were classified as 'others' (13.1%). Out of a total of 559 references, 249 (44.5%) could not be traced. After critically analyzing the 310 traceable references, 197 (63.5%) were adjudged justifiable, 30 (9.7%) inaccurate/false, 79 (25.5%) exaggerated and 15 (4.8%) ambiguous.

Conclusion: Results of this study show for the first time that the claims substantiated with references in the pharmaceutical advertisements in Pakistan are highly unreliable.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ann Intern Med. 1992 Jun 1;116(11):912-9 - PubMed
    1. J Am Board Fam Pract. 2001 May-Jun;14(3):197-200 - PubMed
    1. BMJ. 2001 Aug 18;323(7309):378-81 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Epidemiol. 1991;44 Suppl 2:49S-55S - PubMed
    1. Int J Health Serv. 1982;12(4):585-96 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources