Possible survival benefit of high-dose-intensity methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin combination therapy (HD-MVAC) over conventional MVAC in metastatic urothelial carcinoma patients
- PMID: 17933135
Possible survival benefit of high-dose-intensity methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin combination therapy (HD-MVAC) over conventional MVAC in metastatic urothelial carcinoma patients
Abstract
Eight patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma received high-dose (HD)-MVAC therapy, which consisted of methotrexate (30 mg/m2) on day 1, vinblastine (3 mg/m2) on day 2, doxorubicin (30 mg/m2) on day 2 and cisplatin (70 mg/m2) on day 2 (14-day cycle). Patients were treated with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) (100 microg) subcutaneously from day 4 to 10. For comparison, 7 patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma who received conventional (C)-MVAC (28-day cycle) were enrolled in this study. Overall survival in the HD-MVAC group was significantly better than that in the C-MVAC group (p = 0.012, log rank test). The overall response rate for measurable metastatic lesions was similar in both groups (HD-MVAC, 62.5% vs. C-MVAC, 57.1%, p =0.622). The patients in the HD-MVAC group were able to receive significantly more courses than the C-MVAC group (HD-MVAC, median 3 courses vs. C-MVAC, 2 courses, p=0.045, Student's t test). The frequency of grade 3/4 toxicities was not statistically different between the 2 groups. HD-MVAC therapy rather than C-MVAC therapy may be advocated as a first-line chemotherapy for metastatic patients, since HD-MVAC is associated with a shorter period required for each course, a lower frequency of dose reduction and a possible benefit in terms of overall survival.
Similar articles
-
Docetaxel and cisplatin with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) versus MVAC with G-CSF in advanced urothelial carcinoma: a multicenter, randomized, phase III study from the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group.J Clin Oncol. 2004 Jan 15;22(2):220-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.02.152. Epub 2003 Dec 9. J Clin Oncol. 2004. PMID: 14665607 Clinical Trial.
-
Phase III comparison of methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (MVAC) vs. doxorubicin and cisplatin (AC) in women with advanced primary or recurrent metastatic carcinoma of the uterine endometrium.Gynecol Oncol. 2006 Mar;100(3):501-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.08.021. Epub 2005 Sep 26. Gynecol Oncol. 2006. PMID: 16185755 Clinical Trial.
-
Clinical results and quality of life analysis for the MVAC combination (methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin) in carcinoma of the uterine cervix: A Gynecologic Oncology Group study.Gynecol Oncol. 2006 Mar;100(3):537-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.09.023. Epub 2005 Oct 10. Gynecol Oncol. 2006. PMID: 16216315 Clinical Trial.
-
[Outcome of treatment with surgical resection of the remaining tumor after modified M-VAC treatment for advanced urothelial carcinoma].Hinyokika Kiyo. 2005 Mar;51(3):155-8. Hinyokika Kiyo. 2005. PMID: 15852667 Review. Japanese.
-
Effect of recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in patients receiving methotrexate/vinblastine/doxorubicin/cisplatin therapy for the treatment of transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary tract.Semin Oncol. 1994 Feb;21(1 Suppl 1):70-4. Semin Oncol. 1994. PMID: 7512280 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Effectiveness and safety of primary prophylaxis of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor during dose-dense chemotherapy for urothelial cancer: Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Use of G-CSF 2022.Int J Clin Oncol. 2024 May;29(5):545-550. doi: 10.1007/s10147-024-02491-6. Epub 2024 Mar 22. Int J Clin Oncol. 2024. PMID: 38517658
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Supplementary concepts
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources