Underreporting of induced and spontaneous abortion in the United States: an analysis of the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth
- PMID: 17933292
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1728-4465.2007.00130.x
Underreporting of induced and spontaneous abortion in the United States: an analysis of the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth
Abstract
Underreporting of induced abortions in surveys is widespread, both in countries where the procedure is illegal or highly restricted and in those where it is legal. In this study, we find that fewer than one half of induced abortions performed in the United States in 1997-2001 (47 percent) were reported by women during face-to-face interviews in the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG). Hispanic and black women and those with low income were among the least likely to report their experience of abortion. Women were also less likely to report abortions that occurred when they were in their 20s. Second-trimester abortions were more likely to be reported than first-trimester terminations. The levels of recent spontaneous abortion reported in the 2002 NSFG were consistent with the accumulated body of clinical research, although substantially more lifetime pregnancy losses were reported on self-administered surveys than in face-to-face interviews. Subsequent research should explore strategies to improve information collected on abortion, and, in the interim, research involving pregnancy outcomes should be adjusted for unreported induced abortions.
Similar articles
-
Measuring the extent of abortion underreporting in the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth.Fam Plann Perspect. 1998 May-Jun;30(3):128-33, 138. Fam Plann Perspect. 1998. PMID: 9635261
-
Effect of ACASI on Reporting of Abortion and Other Pregnancy Outcomes in the US National Survey of Family Growth.Stud Fam Plann. 2018 Sep;49(3):259-278. doi: 10.1111/sifp.12068. Epub 2018 Jul 24. Stud Fam Plann. 2018. PMID: 30040126 Free PMC article.
-
Abortion surveillance--United States, 2009.MMWR Surveill Summ. 2012 Nov 23;61(8):1-44. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2012. PMID: 23169413
-
Breast cancer and abortion: collaborative reanalysis of data from 53 epidemiological studies, including 83?000 women with breast cancer from 16 countries.Lancet. 2004 Mar 27;363(9414):1007-16. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)15835-2. Lancet. 2004. PMID: 15051280 Review.
-
The abortion trend after the pronatalist turn of population policies in Iran: a systematic review from 2005 to 2022.BMC Public Health. 2024 Jul 15;24(1):1885. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19249-4. BMC Public Health. 2024. PMID: 39010012 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Patterns of contraceptive use before and after an abortion: results from a nationally representative survey of women undergoing an abortion in France.Contraception. 2010 Oct;82(4):337-44. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2010.03.011. Epub 2010 Apr 21. Contraception. 2010. PMID: 20851227 Free PMC article.
-
An Assessment of Third-Party Reporting of Close Ties to Measure Sensitive Behaviors: The Confidante Method to Measure Abortion Incidence in Ethiopia and Uganda.Stud Fam Plann. 2021 Dec;52(4):513-538. doi: 10.1111/sifp.12180. Epub 2021 Nov 11. Stud Fam Plann. 2021. PMID: 34762302 Free PMC article.
-
Social disparities in women's health service use in the United States: a population-based analysis.Ann Epidemiol. 2014 Feb;24(2):135-43. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2013.10.018. Epub 2013 Nov 8. Ann Epidemiol. 2014. PMID: 24332620 Free PMC article.
-
Perceptions and practices of illegal abortion among urban young adults in the Philippines: a qualitative study.Stud Fam Plann. 2011 Dec;42(4):261-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4465.2011.00289.x. Stud Fam Plann. 2011. PMID: 22292245 Free PMC article.
-
Exploring U.S. men's birth intentions.Matern Child Health J. 2014 Apr;18(3):625-33. doi: 10.1007/s10995-013-1286-x. Matern Child Health J. 2014. PMID: 23793481 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Molecular Biology Databases