Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Nov;61(11):984-9.
doi: 10.1136/jech.2006.058404.

Can I risk using public services? Perceived consequences of seeking help and health care among households living in poverty: qualitative study

Affiliations

Can I risk using public services? Perceived consequences of seeking help and health care among households living in poverty: qualitative study

Krysia Canvin et al. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2007 Nov.

Abstract

Objectives: To improve understanding of how families living in adverse conditions perceive their encounters with public services and how past experiences influence current and future attempts to seek help.

Design: Qualitative interviews with adult members of households living in poverty in deprived areas, plus observations conducted in the surrounding neighbourhoods and service settings.

Participants: Purposive sample of 25 adults living in a deprived area, on welfare benefits.

Setting: Eight sites in disadvantaged areas in Merseyside, North Wales, London and Greater Manchester in 2004/05.

Results: Participants generally perceived public services as a source of distrust and a potential risk to well-being. Encounters with a range of services were perceived as risky in terms of losing resources, being misunderstood or harshly judged, and carrying the ultimate threat of losing custody of their children. Participants perceived that they were subjected to increasing levels of surveillance, with fear of "being told on" by neighbours, in addition to service providers, adding to anxiety. Adverse consequences included avoiding child health and social services, anxiety and self-imposed isolation.

Conclusions: Approaching services was perceived as akin to taking a gamble that might or might not result in their needs being met. Faced with this "choice", participants employed strategies to minimise the risks that on the surface may appear risky to health. If public services are to succeed in providing support to disadvantaged families, greater efforts are needed to build trust and demonstrate understanding for the strategies these families use to maintain their well-being against formidable odds.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Acheson D. Independent inquiry into inequalities in health report. London: Stationery Office, 1998
    1. Samad L, Tate A R, Dezateux C.et al Differences in risk factors for partial and no immunisation in the first year of life: prospective cohort study. BMJ 20063321312–1313. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Harrington P M, Woodman C, Shannon W F. Low immunisation uptake: Is the process the problem? J Epidemiol Community Health 200054394–400. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wiggins M, Oakley A, Roberts I.et al Postnatal support for mothers living in disadvantaged inner city areas: a randomised controlled trial. J Epidemiol Community Health 200559288–295. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Woods L, Rachet B, Riga M.et al Geographical variation in life expectancy at birth in England and Wales is largely explained by deprivation. J Epidemiol Community Health 200559115–120. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types